How Can I Solve a Projectile Motion Problem Without Knowing the Mass?

  • Thread starter Thread starter saschouch
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Motion
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a projectile motion problem involving a sled with a rider on an inclined hill. The sled starts with an initial velocity and encounters friction as it moves down the hill and onto a ramp. The challenge is to determine how high the rider gets off the ground without knowing the mass of the sled and rider.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the implications of not knowing the mass and explore whether mass affects the final outcome. There are attempts to set up energy equations in terms of mass and to understand the role of kinetic and potential energy in the problem.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, with some suggesting methods to express energy in terms of mass and others questioning the assumptions about energy conservation. There is a recognition that mass may not be necessary for the final answer, and guidance has been offered on how to approach the energy calculations.

Contextual Notes

There is an ongoing discussion about the effects of friction and the need to calculate normal forces, as well as the challenge of determining final velocities without explicit mass values. The problem setup includes specific angles and coefficients of friction that are critical to the discussion.

saschouch
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
I've been working on this for the past 3 days, and I have come up with no logical solution. Please help, even if it's just telling me how to set up my equations correctly, because I just can't seem to.

A sled with rider (no mass given) starts with an initial velocity of 4 m/s at the top of a hill that is inclined at 12 degrees with the horizontal. The hillside is 195m long, and the coefficient of friction between snow and sled is .06. At the bottom of the hill, the snow is level and the coefficient of friction is unchanged. There exists a 35 degree (from horizontal) ramp that is 5m long 30m from the bottom of the hill. How high does the rider get off of the ground?

If i had a mass, this wouldn't be so hard. Apart from struggling to find a force or final velocity, what can I possibly do? I have the whole KE=1/2mv^2 part started, and the PE=KE, but i have no idea where to go from there. i know that it is POSSIBLE to solve this without knowing mass, I just don't know how to really set it up correctly.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
did you try using the mass equal to one and then the mass equal to any other number and seeing if the answer is different. Because if they don't give you a mass you should see if mass matters in the end.
 
I'm certain that mass doesn't matter in the end. I also know that I will be needing to leave it as m in my equations, and just plugging those into other equations. I just don't know where to really start.
 
First find the total energy for the system in terms of m. At the top of the slope we have

[tex] E_{tot} = \frac{1}{2}mv^2 + mgh = \frac{1}{2}m(4)^2 + m \times 9.81 \times 195 \sin(12)[/tex]

now think about what's happened to the system in the course of the sled moving to the bottom of the slope.
 
Last edited:
At the top of the slope, the KE should be zero, right? and at the bottom, the PE will be zero, and the KE will be the number that PE was at the top. What I am having trouble understanding is how to calculate the final velocity at the bottom of the slope, and how to use the force of friction/coefficient to determine how it will effect the velocity.
 
He's already moving at 4m/s so his KE won't be zero at the top.

Next you should try and work out the magnitude of the normal reaction of the slope so that you can work out how much energy is lost to friction.
 
ok, i'll try that. thanks a LOT for your help.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K