David Asks: Does Beckenstein's Law Work Both Ways?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter straycat
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Law
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Beckenstein's Law asserts that the entropy associated with an event horizon is proportional to its area, as discussed in Smolin's "Three Roads to Quantum Gravity." The forum discussion explores whether this principle applies in both directions across the event horizon, questioning if the entropy inside a black hole correlates with the entropy of the outside universe. A participant argues that the concept of entropy within a black hole is not well-defined, emphasizing the complexities of defining entropy in the context of gravitational fields and quantum gravity theories.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Beckenstein's Law
  • Familiarity with the holographic principle
  • Basic knowledge of black hole physics
  • Awareness of quantum gravity concepts
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of Beckenstein's Law in modern physics
  • Study the holographic principle and its applications
  • Explore different approaches to quantum gravity, such as causal sets and spin foam models
  • Investigate the relationship between entropy and gravitational fields
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, cosmologists, and students interested in black hole thermodynamics and the foundations of quantum gravity.

straycat
Messages
182
Reaction score
0
Hey all,

I am reading Smolin's Three Roads to Quantum Gravity, and have just re-encountered an old idea, Beckenstein's Law, which states: "With every [event] horizon that forms a boundary separating an observer from a region which is hidden from them, there is associated an entropy which measures the amount of information which is hidden behind it. This entropy is always proportional to the area of the horizon." (pages 86-7). Smolin goes on later in the book to relate this idea to the holographic principle, which states that the horizon can be thought of as a computer that represents the state of the object enclosed by the horizon.

Here's my question. Does this principle work in both directions, ie from either side of the event horizon? IOW, can you imagine an observer on the *inside* of the event horizon (or imagine that the black hole *is* the observer), and associate the entropy of the horizon with the entropy of the *outside* universe? If so, does that mean that the entropy inside a black hole is equal to the entropy of the remaining universe (which seems difficult to accept)? Alternatively, does the area of the event horizon look different depending on which side of it you are on?

David
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
straycat said:
Hey all,

I am reading Smolin's Three Roads to Quantum Gravity, and have just re-encountered an old idea, Beckenstein's Law, which states: "With every [event] horizon that forms a boundary separating an observer from a region which is hidden from them, there is associated an entropy which measures the amount of information which is hidden behind it. This entropy is always proportional to the area of the horizon." (pages 86-7). Smolin goes on later in the book to relate this idea to the holographic principle, which states that the horizon can be thought of as a computer that represents the state of the object enclosed by the horizon.

Here's my question. Does this principle work in both directions, ie from either side of the event horizon? IOW, can you imagine an observer on the *inside* of the event horizon (or imagine that the black hole *is* the observer), and associate the entropy of the horizon with the entropy of the *outside* universe? If so, does that mean that the entropy inside a black hole is equal to the entropy of the remaining universe (which seems difficult to accept)? Alternatively, does the area of the event horizon look different depending on which side of it you are on?

David
I am afraid not :smile: It is moreover meaningless to speak about the ``entropy´´ IN a black hole, this concept cannot be well defined. Entropy is one of the most difficult notions in physics to deal with :what are the fundamental degrees of freedom (of the gravitational field) and how to count them? There does not exist yet a satisfactory definition in my view, although discrete approaches to quantum gravity try to make plausible ansatze (such as in causal sets or spin foam business). The correspondence between entropy (as used in the heuristic science of thermodynamics) and horizon area is nevertheless very striking.

Cheers,

Careful
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K