Find the laplace transform of log[x]

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the Laplace transform of the logarithmic function, specifically log[x]. Participants explore the properties of the function and its implications for the existence of the Laplace transform.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the integral definition of the Laplace transform and question whether the transform exists due to the behavior of log[t] at t=0. There are attempts to clarify the conditions under which the Laplace transform can be defined.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with various interpretations being explored regarding the existence of the Laplace transform for log[t]. Some participants provide insights into the integral's behavior, while others express skepticism about the function's continuity and integrability at the lower limit.

Contextual Notes

There is a focus on the continuity of the function log[t] at t=0 and the implications of its discontinuity for the Laplace transform. Participants mention the need for piecewise continuity and integrability, raising questions about the validity of the transform in this context.

mathelord
how do i find the laplace transform of log[x]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The Laplace transform of [itex]\log t[/itex] is

[tex]\int_0^{\infty}e^{-st} \log t dt[/tex]
 
i know that but i tink the final answer is infinity,thats ridiculus,so i need confirmation
 
I don't think there is a "closed form" expression for the integral but the integral should be finite since log x integrates to x log x - x which goes to 0 as x -> 0.
 
I don't think that this Laplace transform exists. A necessary condition for the existence of the Laplace transform of [itex]f(t)[/itex] is that [itex]f[/itex] be continuous on [itex]0 \leq t < \infty[/itex], but [itex]\log(t)[/itex] isn't even defined at [itex]t=0[/itex].
 
The condition for the existence of the Laplace Transform is that function must be piecewise continuous and of exponential order. In short, it has to be integrable.
 
Tide said:
piecewise continuous
Right, but the interval has to include [itex]t=0[/itex], where the integrand has a vertical asymptote. Doesn't that screw things up?
 
Last edited:
Tom Mattson said:
Right, but the interval has to include [itex]t=0[/itex], where the integrand has an infinite discontinuity. Doesn't that screw things up?

Yes, the fact that the discontinuity occurs at t = 0 poses a problem but you can define the Laplace transform by setting the lower limit to [itex]\epsilon > 0[/itex] and passing to the limit 0.

In fact, we know that the integral

[tex]\int_{0}^{\infty}\ln x e^{-x} dx = -\gamma[/tex]

is just the Euler-Mascheroni constant. We can use this result to evaluate the Laplace transform:

[tex]\int_{0}^{\infty} \ln t e^{-st} dt = \int_{0}^{\infty} \frac{-\ln s +\ln x}{s}e^{-x}dx[/tex]

with the result

[tex]\int_{0}^{\infty} \ln t e^{-st} dt = - \frac {\ln s + \gamma}{s}[/tex]

which wasn't as bad as I first thought it would be!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K