Is the inernal energy of the universe decreasing?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The internal energy of the universe is decreasing due to its expansion, which increases the work done (W), while the total energy (Q) remains constant. The concept of energy density multiplied by volume, referred to as PQ, is introduced but is not a definitive measure of the universe's energy as it is coordinate-dependent and not necessarily conserved. In standard isotropic cosmologies, specifically Friedmann-Robertson-Walker (FRW) models, PQ is conserved in "dust" universes but not in those with pressure, such as our current matter-dominated universe. Historical contexts show that during radiation domination, PQ was not even approximately conserved.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Friedmann-Robertson-Walker (FRW) cosmologies
  • Knowledge of energy density and its implications in cosmology
  • Familiarity with the concepts of work and energy conservation
  • Basic grasp of coordinate systems in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of energy density in cosmological models
  • Study the conservation laws in Friedmann-Robertson-Walker cosmologies
  • Explore the differences between matter-dominated and radiation-dominated universes
  • Examine the role of pressure in the dynamics of cosmic expansion
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, cosmologists, and physics students interested in the dynamics of the universe's energy and expansion, as well as those studying the implications of cosmological models on energy conservation.

alias25
Messages
197
Reaction score
0
cause the universe is expanding so it s doing work is increasing and the total Q energy in the universe is constant so Q(constant) = U + W(increasing)
so U is decreasing?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
The total energy of the universe isn't really well defined.

One can define an intergal of energy density * volume

PQ= (energy density) * (volume-in-cosmological-coordinates).

However, this intergal, which I call PQ for no particularly good reason except to give it a name, is not really the "energy" of the universe. It is not the energy because it depends on one's choice of coordinates, and because it's not necessarily conserved. But it's an interesting quantity, nonetheless.

For standard isotropic cosmologies (FRW cosmologies), PQ is conserved exactly in "dust" universes, and is not exactly conserved in any universe where there is pressure. Our universe is matter dominated at the current time, so the pressure is very low, but it is non-zero, thus PQ is not exactly conserved in our universe, but is approximately conserved. (This assumes that one belives our universe is modeled by a FRW cosmology).

Note that in the past, the universe was radiation dominated rather than matter dominated, making the pressure high, and that in this era of the universe PQ was not even approximately conserved.

This is discussed a bit in MTW, where the above quantity is calculated in more detail, and it is stressed that this quantity should *NOT* be considered to be the "energy of the universe" (even thought it is tempting to do so).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
6K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
1K