Finding a fraction using series.

  • Thread starter Thread starter misogynisticfeminist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fraction Series
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding a fraction that closely approximates the decimal 0.987654321, with a focus on using geometric series and continued fractions as potential methods.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the use of geometric series and derivatives to approximate the decimal. Some question whether the decimal is repeating, while others suggest factoring and summing powers of ten. Continued fractions are also proposed as a method for finding rational approximations.

Discussion Status

Multiple approaches are being discussed, including geometric series and continued fractions. Some participants have provided insights into the nature of the decimal and its representation as a fraction, but there is no explicit consensus on the best method to use.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of the decimal being a terminating decimal, which may influence the choice of methods. The discussion also highlights the potential complexity of using geometric series for this specific case.

misogynisticfeminist
Messages
370
Reaction score
0
How do i find the fraction closest to 0.987654321 using the geometric series?

I have tried taking the geometric series and its derivatives but none seem to fit it. Can anyone help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is that supposed to be a repeating decimal?
 
If it's not a repeating decimal then you want to factor out [itex]10^{-9}[/itex] then write the remaining factor as a sum of ascending powers of 10 and your earlier proposed method will give you the desired result.
 
[tex]0.987654321 = \frac{987654321}{1000000000}[/tex]
That's all. There's no sense in using geometric progression here, because it's a terminating decimal.
OTOH,
[tex]0.\bar{9}8765432\bar{1} = 987654321*\Sigma_{i=1}^{i=\infty}(10^{-9i})[/tex]
and you can then work out the summation with the formula for the sum of a geometric series.
 
misogynisticfeminist said:
How do i find the fraction closest to 0.987654321 using the geometric series?
I have tried taking the geometric series and its derivatives but none seem to fit it. Can anyone help?

There is a method of finding rational approximations to real numbers called "continued fractions". You can do it on your calculator. I will illustrate:

0.9876543210 invert and get
1.0125000000 subtract 1 to get
.01250000000 invert and get
80.000000064 subtract 80 to get
.000000064 invert to get
15625000.000 subtract 15625000 to get
0

This sequence terminated, which won't happen for an irrational number like sqrt(2) or pi.

The important sequence is the numbers are the things you subtracted, which were the integer parts of the numbers. The sequence is:

1, 80, 15625000

One can get a good fractional approximation by reversing the process. Since 15625000 is so big, I'll start with the "80". The reversed process (in rational numbers) is:

80
1/80
1+1/80 = 81/80
80/81.

So a darned good fractional answer is 80/81.

This is a very general algorithm. let me think a minute and I'll try and figure out how to do it with the geometric series and I'll edit that solution in.

[tex]\frac{1-x^n}{1-x} = 1 +x + x^2 + ... + x^{n-1}[/tex]

differentiate with respect to x get:

[tex]\frac{1-x^n}{(1-x)^2} - \frac{nx^{n-1}}{1-x}<br /> = 1 + 2x + 3x^2 + ... + (n-1)x^{n-2}[/tex]

Now put x = 0.1 and n-1=9. The right hand side will become 1.23456789 and you can get what you want with some artful subtraction and multiplication by constants. But I haven't worked it out to see if it gives the same answer as the continued fraction expansion (i.e. 80/81).

Carl
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K