The discussion revolves around a video linked by a participant, which appears to depict soldiers engaging in a dangerous activity involving a target. Participants express skepticism about the video's authenticity and share their thoughts on the actions portrayed, as well as related commentary on media and humor.
Participants generally disagree on the authenticity of the video, with some firmly believing it is fake while others entertain the possibility that it could be real. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the video's legitimacy.
Participants rely on subjective interpretations of the video's content and context, with no consensus on the definitions of authenticity or the implications of the actions depicted.
That kind of crap is common on your TV, you say?cronxeh said:If you think that's stupid, wait till you see Ann Coulter:
http://therepublica.com/media.php?path=/videos/blame_canada.wmv
"There is a lot of dog sledding"
Smurf said:
blimkie said:
As if that itself isn't stupid enough. They had to do it with an Ak-47, probably the most inaccurate rifle in mass production.blimkie said:
Smurf said:
Smurf said:
The 47 has it's merits, but accuracy isn't one of them.cronxeh said:
As much as the russian in me begs to differ, I'll agree that its effective range is only 150-250 meters, and certainly not in Afghani hands and not standing
Which just makes it all the more ridiculous that they continued their stupidity.
Well, assuming it is real...didn't you notice the people laughing in the background after they shot him? They may have done it on purpose.Pengwuino said:
