Why the molecules still moving to create the diffusion and the effusion?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the movement of molecules in the context of diffusion and effusion, exploring the underlying reasons for this movement despite the molecules having a net charge of zero. Participants seek to clarify the mechanisms behind these processes.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions why molecules continue to move to create diffusion and effusion if they have no net charge.
  • Another participant suggests that diffusion and effusion are statistical effects arising from a large number of particles, comparing it to the behavior of billiard balls.
  • A different participant argues that the absence of a net charge does not imply that molecules are motionless, stating that they can still move at constant speed until acted upon by a force, such as a collision with another molecule.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

The discussion contains differing viewpoints on the nature of molecular movement and the role of forces, with no consensus reached on the initial question posed.

Contextual Notes

Some assumptions regarding molecular behavior and forces acting on them remain unaddressed, and the discussion does not resolve the complexities of the mechanisms involved in diffusion and effusion.

WARGREYMONKKTL
Messages
54
Reaction score
0
i know that the molecules in the "freedom" form that have charges equal 0. but i wonder why the molecules still moving to create the diffusion and the effusion?
some one please explain to me. thanks:!)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is unclear exactly what you're asking.
 
Diffusion and effusion are not results of any particular interaction between the molecules (except collisions). It is a statistical effect resulting from having a gazillion particles. It works just as well with billiard balls.
I hope it clarifies your question somewhat.
 
Why wouldn't they move? I think you are saying that because they do not have a net charge the molecues would have no force on them. That's not true- there are other forces. But even if a molecule has no force on it, that doesn't mean it is motionless. It would still move (at constant speed in a straight line) until there was a force (such as hitting another molecule).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K