Are All Real-Valued Functions with Zeros Zero Divisors?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 1800bigk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Abstract Zero
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of zero divisors within the set of all real-valued functions defined for all reals, focusing on the conditions under which the product of two functions results in the zero function.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Exploratory

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the definition of zero divisors and question the implications of a function being zero at specific points versus being the zero function overall. They discuss examples of functions and their products, questioning how to identify zero divisors based on their definitions.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants examining various examples and definitions. Some have proposed specific functions as potential zero divisors, while others are clarifying the conditions under which a function qualifies as a zero divisor. There is a mix of interpretations regarding the definitions and examples provided.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the assumption of standard function multiplication and are considering the implications of functions being zero at certain points or intervals. There is a discussion about the nature of zero divisors and the conditions that must be met for functions to be classified as such.

1800bigk
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
Let R be the set of all real valued functions defined for all reals under function addition and multiplication.

Determine all zero divisors of R.

A zero divisor is a non zero element such that when multiplied with another nonzero element the product is zero.
So I said that the zero divisors of R would be all the functions in R that are not the zero function but take on the value of zero at least one time.
Am I close?
acoording to my answer though f=sin X and g= x-2 would be zero divisors because niether function is the zero function but fg = (sin X)(x-2) = 0 at x=2
but my teacher said this is wrong he said the product has to be zero for all x.
How would I even begin to find all the functions that are not the zero function but when multiplied together is zero for all x?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
How are you defining multiplication in this case? Are you saying that if a function is 0 for any x then it is the "zero" function?
 
The problem says under normal function multiplication. The zero function is
Z(x)= 0 for all x
 
So f(x)= 2x is 0 for x= 0. But f*g is not, in general, equal to the 0 function.
 
so are there any zero divisors
 
One thing I would do on a problem like this if I got stuck is to try and specialize the definitions to the situation at hand.

You know that f is a zero divisor iff there exists g such that f*g = 0.

So if f, g, and 0 are all functions, what form does this condition take?
 
What about, for example, f(x)= 0 if x<0, 1 if x>= 0; g(x)= 1 if x< 0; 0 if x>=0?
 
the piecewise functions above are both zero divisors. since neither function is the zero function but their product is zero for all x, ok I think I get now.

so any function that is not the zero function , but takes on the value of zero for some x, is a zero divisor. Becasue if my function f takes on zero for some interval I, I can always construct another function g that is zero on I compliment.

just to make sure I get this, f(x) = x^2 + 1 cannot be zero divisor because I would have to multiply it by a function g that's always zero, which would make g the zero function.
 
Last edited:
It doesn't have to be "intervals". Let f(x)= 0 if x is rational, 1 if x is irrational, g(x)= 1 if x is rational, 0 if x is irrational.

Your second statement is correct: if f(x) is NEVER 0 then it is not a zero divisor.
 
  • #10
Well, technically, if a function is zero anywhere, then it is zero on some interval (plus some other points).
 
  • #11
Do you mean you are considering a singleton {a} as an interval?
 
  • #12
Sure, since {a} = [a, a]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 55 ·
2
Replies
55
Views
8K