Proving Laplacian in Cylindrical Coordinates

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the form of the Laplacian in cylindrical coordinates. The original poster attempts to derive the Laplacian by calculating second derivatives in terms of Cartesian coordinates and expressing them in cylindrical coordinates.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss two approaches to deriving the Laplacian: one involving direct calculation of second derivatives in cylindrical coordinates and another that suggests using the Cartesian form as a basis for substitution. Questions arise regarding the validity of the original poster's method and the reasoning behind the characterization of one approach as "backward."

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on alternative methods for deriving the Laplacian, while the original poster expresses interest in understanding the limitations of their initial approach. There is an acknowledgment of corrections made in the algebra during the discussion.

Contextual Notes

The original poster indicates challenges with the algebra involved and expresses uncertainty about the effectiveness of their methods. There is a mention of mistakes that were corrected in the latter stages of the discussion.

quasar987
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Messages
4,796
Reaction score
32
I'm supposed to prove the laplacian in cylindrical coord. is what it is. I tried tackling the problem in two ways and none work! I have no idea what's the matter. The first way is to calculate d²f/dr² , d²f/dO² and d²f/dz² and isolate d²f/dx² , d²f/dy² and d²f/dz². In cylindrical coord.,

x=rcosO
y=rsinO
z=z

(I'm not writting partial derivatives because in latex it's a pain in the @)

[tex]df/dr = df/dx dx/dr + df/dy dy/dr[/tex]
[tex]\Rightarrow d^2f/dr^2 = d^2f/dx^2 dx/dr + df/dx d^2x/dr^2 + d^2f/dy^2 dy/dr + df/dy d^2y/dr^2[/tex]
[tex]d^2f/dr^2 = d^2f/dx^2 cos^2\theta +d^2f/dy^2 sin^2\theta[/tex]

In the same way,

[tex]d^2f/d\theta^2 = r^2 (d^2f/dx^2 d^2f/dx^2)[/tex]

Hence, it would seem that the laplacian in cylindrical is just (1/r²)d²f/dO² + d^2f/dz^2. :frown:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you tried

[tex]\frac {\partial}{\partial x} = \frac {\partial r}{\partial x} \frac {\partial}{\partial r} + \frac {\partial \theta}{\partial x} \frac {\partial}{\partial \theta}[/tex]

etc.?
 
You are doing it backwards!
You know that the Laplacian is
[tex]\frac{\partial^2U}{/partial x^2}+ \frac{\partial^2U}{\partial y^2}+ \frac{\partial^2U}{\partial z^2}[/tex]
in Cartesian coordinates so you should be writing
[tex]\frac{\partialU}{\partial z}=\frac{\partial U}{\partial r}\frac{\partial r}{\partial x}+ \frac{\partial U}{\partial \theta}\frac{\partial \theta}{\partial x}+ \frac{\partial U}{\partial z}\frac{\partial z}{\partial x}[/tex]
etc. so that you can substitute into that.
 
Yeah that's the "second way" I was referring to! Why do you call "backward" the first way? It's just as good imo. It's not guarenteed that you'll be able to isolate the cartesian laplancian, but if you can, shouldn't it give the right answer too ?!
 
Ok, after working out the algebra completely and correcting a few mistake I had made in the second way (the one advetised by HallsofIvy), it works. But I'm still very interested to know why the "backwards" way doesn't work.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K