Integral in Physics - Learn How to Solve Problems

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter blackcode
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral Physics
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of integrals in physics, particularly in the context of calculating work done and understanding changes in magnetic fields. Participants explore how integrals can be used to sum infinitesimal contributions in various physical scenarios, including work done by forces and the behavior of magnetic fields as parameters change.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant explains that integrals are used to sum infinitesimal parts, particularly in calculating work done by a force over a distance, leading to the formula W = 0.5*ks^2 for spring work.
  • Another participant questions how to express the differential change in magnetic field (dB) when the radius (R) in the equation B=((mu sub naught)*i)/(2*pi*R) is changing, expressing confusion about the role of dR.
  • A later reply suggests that dB can be expressed as dB=((mu sub naught)*i)/(2*pi*dR) and discusses manipulating the equation for simplicity, indicating that dR appears in the denominator.
  • Another participant asserts that the equation for B is derived from a more general equation and indicates that no integral is necessary when considering an infinitely long wire, suggesting that B varies as 1/R.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the necessity of integrals in certain contexts, particularly regarding the changing radius in magnetic field calculations. There is no consensus on the best approach to these problems, and multiple competing views remain.

Contextual Notes

Some participants acknowledge potential mistakes in their explanations and invite corrections, indicating uncertainty in their reasoning. The discussion reflects varying levels of understanding regarding the application of integrals in physics problems.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students and enthusiasts of physics who are exploring the mathematical foundations of physical concepts, particularly integrals and their applications in work and magnetic fields.

blackcode
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Can you help me know more about the integral in physics? Sometimes, I see some problems use this to solve. How can I figure out? thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You usually use the integral when you want to do a sum of infinitisemally (Blah, my spelling sucks.. :P) small parts of something... or a sum of infinitesmally small parts of something multiplied by something else...
For example... work..
W = Fs (Where s is the distance in the direction of the force... leaving out the vector dot product)
If you were to, instead of take s as a whole distance, break s up into differential elements of infinitesmally small value ds, the work done over this infinitesmally small distance would be:
dW = F ds
And that uses the concept of integrals in the sense that you want the TOTAL work done... i.e. the sum of all those differential elements:
W = dW1 + dW2 + dW3... + dWn
Where n is where the segments finally end at the final distance.
And since the integral is essentially an infinite amount of sums of small bits of... stuff... you can use its concept to find the total sum.
It's especially useful for the work done by a spring; since the force is non-constant overall, which would mean ks^2 wouldn't work as a formula...
So, you use the concept of the integral...
At anyone point, the difference in work from the point just before it would be:
dW = F ds
You know that the spring force is F = ks... so: (where k is a constant)
dW = ks ds (Where ds is an infinitesmally small difference in distance)
Since it would be long and boring to do this by hand, we use integration:
W = integral (ks)ds = 0.5*ks^2
And that's where that formula comes from...

I probably made a mistake somewhere in my vague, useless, inaccurate attempt at helping you out, so I don't mind if someone corrects me...

By the way, I think this should be in another forum. :P
 
I'm working with the equation B=((mu sub naught)*i)/(2*pi*R). I know that R is changing, but I don't know what dB would look like. I thought that R in the original equation would be dR in the new one, but it doesn't make sense to me that dR would be to the negative one power. Do you have any ideas?
 
WhoWeAre said:
I'm working with the equation B=((mu sub naught)*i)/(2*pi*R). I know that R is changing, but I don't know what dB would look like. I thought that R in the original equation would be dR in the new one, but it doesn't make sense to me that dR would be to the negative one power. Do you have any ideas?

well as in equation
dB=((mu sub naught)*i)/(2*pi*dR) u can c dRis one of the denominator, to make it a neumerator, multiply and divide the equation with R^-1, there u have your dR with negative one in power. this is just done for the sake of simplicity coz it is sometimes easier to solve an intergral with variable in neumerator rather that otherwise.
 
I assume you're working with the equation for an infinitely long wire. The equation you have there was derived from a more general equation so if r varies you will not have to do any sort of integral. That equation is the complete picture in the limit that the wire is infinitely long. So in this case B varies as 1/r with a bunch of constants in front of it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
14K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
28
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
297