What does "Work done on the object" mean

  • Thread starter Thread starter duoheer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mean
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies the distinction between "work done on the object" and "work done by the net force." "Work done on the object" encompasses various forces acting on the object, including friction and conservative forces, and can involve energy exchange within a system. In contrast, "work done by the net force" is criticized for oversimplifying the concept by failing to emphasize the object affected by the forces. Ultimately, the work done is equal to the change in the object's kinetic energy (KE).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic physics concepts such as work and energy.
  • Familiarity with forces, including friction and conservative forces.
  • Knowledge of kinetic energy (KE) and its relationship to work.
  • Concept of energy transfer within systems.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of work-energy theorem in classical mechanics.
  • Explore the role of frictional forces in energy transfer.
  • Investigate conservative forces and their impact on potential energy.
  • Learn about energy exchange in multi-part systems.
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators teaching mechanics, and anyone interested in understanding the nuances of work and energy concepts in physical systems.

duoheer
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
what is the difference between "work done on the object" and "work done by the net force"? if there is a difference, can u give me an example? thanks thx
 
Physics news on Phys.org
"Work done on the object" is a general phrase ;
the source Force can be specified (as, "W on object by friction Force"),
they can be a subset of Forces ("total W by all the conservative Forces") (=PE's),
they can be the entire set of all Forces applied to the object.
The object can be a system composed of multiple parts, with the parts
able to Exchange Energy with another part.
The approach introduced by this phrase can be extended to treat thermal Energy transfer.

Here, the source Force might *by implication* be a Force that has been
the focus of the last paragraph or two.

"Work done by the net Force" is a lousy phrase ;
it rewards students who do not distinguish cause (Forces, with sources)
from effect (ma).
It avoids mention of the most important item of the process (the OBJECT which Force is applied to...). It is always equal to the change in the (implied) object's KE, so it is at best a riddle-name for d KE.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
858