Can Laplace Transform Converge for Periodic Functions on [0,infty)?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of the Laplace Transform to periodic functions defined on the interval [0, ∞). The original poster is attempting to demonstrate a specific formula for the Laplace Transform of a periodic function.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster outlines their approach by expressing the Laplace Transform as a sum of integrals over intervals defined by the period of the function. They question whether they are on the right track and express difficulty in transforming their expression into the desired form.

Discussion Status

Some participants provide guidance suggesting that the original poster is close to a solution and recommend making a change of variables to leverage the periodicity of the function. There is an ongoing exploration of how to manipulate the terms to achieve the desired result.

Contextual Notes

The discussion involves the periodic nature of the function and the implications this has for the convergence of the Laplace Transform. The original poster is working within the constraints of a specific formula they need to demonstrate.

amcavoy
Messages
663
Reaction score
0
I need to show that for f(t)=f(t+T) on [0,infty), that the Laplace Transform is:

[tex]\mathcal{L}\left[f(t)\right]=\frac{\int_0^Te^{-st}f(t)\,dt}{1-e^{-sT}}.[/tex]

The first thing I did was to write the transform as:

[tex]\mathcal{L}\left[f(t)\right]=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\int_{nT}^{\left(n+1\right)T}e^{-st}f(t)\,dt.[/tex]

Am I on the right track here? It looks like the formula given to me (that I need to show) is an infinite geometric series multiplied by the integral in the numerator. However, I am unable to get what I have into something of that form. Any ideas?

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, you are practically done already. Make a good change of variables, use the periodicity of f, and you're home free.
 
Could you please elaborate on that a bit more? Thank you.
 
Sure, you want each term to give [tex]\int^T_0 e^{-st} f(t) dt[/tex] times the geometric series part, right? So why not try to make a change of variable in each term to see if you can get this out? Make the limits look right for each term and see where that leads you.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K