Loren Booda
- 3,108
- 4
Which of the following will prove not to be a fundamental constant?
The discussion revolves around the concept of "fundamental constants" in physics, questioning which constants may not be truly fundamental and exploring the implications of their definitions and measurements. Participants engage in theoretical reasoning and conceptual clarification regarding the nature of these constants, particularly in relation to quantum mechanics and measurement challenges.
Participants express differing views on the nature and definition of fundamental constants, with no consensus reached on which constants may not be fundamental or how they should be defined in light of quantum mechanics and measurement challenges.
The discussion highlights limitations in the definitions and measurements of fundamental constants, including the dependence on specific conditions and the potential influence of quantum effects. There are unresolved questions regarding the implications of these factors on the understanding of fundamental constants.
HallsofIvy said:Define "fundamental constant". e is simply a specific number. It is a "fundamental constant" in the same sense that 1, -5, or 37.324323 are. The others are all physics constants.
BobG said:In general, I think the idea of fundamental constants that never change seems like a rather elusive idea. Even for 'c', speed of light, special conditions have to be set (only in a vacuum that doesn't actually exist) in order for the speed of light to remain constant.