How Does Integration by Parts Apply in Calculating Average Energy?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Moneer81
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the application of integration by parts in calculating average energy using the formula \(\overline{E} = \frac{\int_{0}^{\infty} E e^{-\frac{E}{kT}} dE}{\int_{0}^{\infty} e^{-\frac{E}{kT}} dE}\). The user correctly identifies the components for integration by parts, setting \(u = E\) and \(dv = e^{-\frac{E}{kT}} dE\). The confusion arises from a textbook's alternative approach, which introduces an unexpected term in the integration process. The user concludes that the textbook's method may contain an error related to the limits of integration.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of integration by parts formula
  • Familiarity with exponential functions and their integrals
  • Knowledge of Boltzmann's constant (k) and temperature (T) in thermodynamics
  • Basic calculus skills, particularly in evaluating improper integrals
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the derivation of integration by parts in calculus
  • Study the properties of the exponential function in thermodynamic contexts
  • Explore common errors in integration techniques and how to identify them
  • Learn about the applications of average energy in statistical mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those studying statistical mechanics and thermodynamics, as well as educators looking to clarify integration techniques in calculus.

Moneer81
Messages
158
Reaction score
2
Hi,

while solving for the average energy given by the following formula:

[tex]\overline {E} = \frac {\int_{0}^{\infty} E e^\frac{-E}{kT}dE}{\int_{0}^{\infty} e^\frac{-E}{kT}dE}[/tex]

where E bar is average energy, k is the Boltzmann's constant, and T is temperature

I had to use integration by parts for the numerator.

Integration by parts formula is [tex]\int u dv = uv - \int v du[/tex]

So I made the following choices (and so did my textbook):

[tex]u = E[/tex]

then [tex]du = dE[/tex]

[tex]dv = e^\frac{-E}{kT}[/tex]

and so [tex]v = -kTe^\frac{-E}{kT}[/tex]

Then I proceeded by applying the integration by parts formula, and the integral of the numerator would be:

[tex]\int_{0}^{\infty} E e^\frac{-E}{kT}dE = -EkTe^\frac{-E}{kT} + kT \int_{0}^{\infty} e^\frac{-E}{kT}dE[/tex]

but to my surprise, the book proceeded in the following manner:

[tex]\int_{0}^{\infty} E e^\frac{-E}{kT}dE = kT \left[e^\frac{-E}{kT} \right]<br /> _{0}^{\infty} + kT \int_{0}^{\infty} e^\frac{-E}{kT}dE[/tex]

That first term to the right of the equal sign threw me off...where did it come from?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
First

[tex]dv=e^{-\frac{E}{kT}} \ dE[/tex]

then you're right. It has to be some error in the book. Perhaps they meant

[tex]kT \left[e^{-\frac{E}{kT}}\right]_{+\infty}^{0}[/tex]

,that is converting the minus before the whole term into an interchange of integration limits.

Daniel.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
10K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
5K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
468
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K