Was Einstein Wrong About Singularity Theory?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Sariaht
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Track
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the validity of Einstein's singularity theory in the context of the Big Bang and the nature of the universe's expansion. Participants explore concepts related to cosmic inflation, the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB), and the implications of these theories on our understanding of the universe.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant argues that if the universe began as a singularity, it would have spread instantly while maintaining the same temperature, suggesting a different interpretation of the Big Bang.
  • Another participant counters that the universe inflated rather than spread and emphasizes that the Big Bang occurred at every position in the universe, not just at a central point.
  • There is a discussion about the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) and its role in understanding the temperature of the universe post-Big Bang.
  • One participant recalls that theories of a Big Bang singularity have been largely discarded, referencing Hawking's later views on the subject.
  • Another participant stresses the importance of understanding existing theories and evidence before proposing new ideas, suggesting that a lack of foundational knowledge may hinder productive discussion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of the universe's expansion and the validity of singularity theories. There is no consensus on the correctness of the claims made, and the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference various concepts and theories without fully resolving the implications of their claims, indicating a need for further clarification on terms like "temperature registered" and the foundational aspects of the Big Bang theory.

Sariaht
Messages
356
Reaction score
0
Proof for that Einsteins singularity theory was wrong:

If the universe from the beginning was a singularity, it did not only spread over space instantly, but also kept the same temperature doing this, cause it's said we might observe big bang one day, and thereby it happened there at the same time as here. We would also be in the middle.

Since every point can be seen as an origo in a neverending space, the universe is a net. What else can it be?

Lets say that the net in the beginning were in c, cause all stringtheorists must agree on that.

Looking closer, we see that there are only ins and outs in the vibration, like in a feather. All with me there?

What if the ins could not become outs but moved vice versa, this would explain Heisenberg's uncertainty principle.

Boblock's sink-source equations should cover why ins attracts outs via the electromagnetic force. The rest has been revealed by those stringphysicists.

What do you think so far; am I on the right track?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The universe did not spread. It inflated. We are not in the middle, and the big bang occurred at every position in the universe. The CMB has also not maintained the same "temperature".
 
What's the CMB?

I ment the temperature registered at a constant timedistance from Big Bang.

My point is (among others) that we are not in the middle of the universe.
 
Last edited:
CMB: Cosmic Microwave Background

Essentially, residual radiation from the Big Bang, from which we can calculate a temperature. What other "temperature registered" could you mean?
 
Originally posted by FZ+
CMB: Cosmic Microwave Background

Essentially, residual radiation from the Big Bang, from which we can calculate a temperature. What other "temperature registered" could you mean?

The temperature inside the big bang, T/(4qr2bb).

q = pi.
 
Last edited:
Originally posted by Sariaht
What's the CMB?

nuff said.


As i recall theories of a big bang singularity have been alrgely discarded, i remember hawking discarding his PhD research on the subject. But not sure.
 
Originally posted by franznietzsche
nuff said.
Agreed. Sariaht, clearly before you can rewrite our theories on how the universe works, you must first understand what it is you are endeavouring to overturn and the evidence that supports it. Otherwise, you're just spinning your wheels in place.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
13K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
17K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K