How Do You Calculate Impact Force for Falling Objects?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the impact force of falling objects, specifically comparing two scenarios involving different weights, heights, and impact areas. Participants explore the relationship between kinetic energy, impact force, and pressure during collisions, while addressing the complexities involved in such calculations.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant requests help calculating the energy at impact for two falling objects with different weights and heights.
  • Another participant clarifies that energy is not measured in lbs force and distinguishes between kinetic energy and impact force.
  • A participant explains that kinetic energy at impact can be calculated using the formula mgh, noting that both scenarios yield the same energy at impact but differ in momentum.
  • Concerns are raised about the difficulty of calculating impact force, which depends on the rate of change of momentum and the duration of the impact, influenced by material properties and shape.
  • A follow-up question asks if using steel surfaces and cylindrical shapes would aid in calculations.
  • One participant suggests modeling the objects as springy masses to account for the varying rates at which different parts of the mass stop upon collision.
  • Another participant asserts that while both objects exert the same force upon collision, the smaller impact area of one object results in higher pressure upon impact.
  • A different participant questions the assumption that both collisions generate the same impact force, indicating uncertainty in that claim.
  • A participant references a previous discussion where they sought similar calculations and mentions using approximations from an older textbook regarding falling objects, including various load factors and equations related to impact force.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether both scenarios generate the same impact force, with some asserting they do while others challenge this notion. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the exact calculations and assumptions involved.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the lack of specific material properties, the complexity of modeling impact dynamics, and the dependence on definitions of force and energy in the context of the discussion.

david robinson
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Could someone please help with this rudimentry calculation. I need to know the difference in the energy at impact between the following two scenarios.

1) 2 lbs falling under gravity from 8 feet with an impact area of 12 mm.

2) 4 lbs falling under gravity from 4 feet with an impact area of 4 mm.

Many Thanks
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
Energy is not measured in lbs force.
 
Realize that the kinetic energy (measured in ft-lbs) at impact is very different from the force of the impact (measured in lbs).

The KE is easy to figure: it's equal to the initial gravitational potential energy = mgh. So both (1) and (2) have the same energy at impact = 2*8 = 4*4 = 16 ft-lbs. (Note that they don't hit with the same momentum (mv); the 4 lb object has greater momentum at impact.)

The impact force is not easy to figure. The average force of impact is a measure of the rate of change of the momentum. (The quicker an object is brought to rest, the greater the average force.) The duration of the impact depends on many things, such as the type of materials involved (steel against steel, etc.), shape, etc. You have not provided sufficient information to calculate the force. (But perhaps an engineer could take a guess as to the relative forces involved based on the behavior of typical materials.)
 
Thanks. If all surfaces were steel and of the same cylindrical shape would that help.
 
To calculate impact force, you need to model the two objects that are colliding. Often this isn't easy. They act as springy/spongy masses, so that some of the mass is stopped almost instantly upon collision and some of the mass farther back stops more slowly. Often the objects are modeled similar to springs with a 'spring constant' in force per unit length. Once you calculate the kinetic energy at impact you can then equate that energy to the energy of the 'spring' and find the force over time and peak force.
 
As stated above both cylinders would have the same energy, and exert the same force upon collision.

But for one of them that force is concentrated into a smaller area, meaning that the smaller has 3 times higher pressure!

The answer is the 4 mm cylinder hits 3 times harder..
 
Crosson said:
As stated above both cylinders would have the same energy, and exert the same force upon collision.
It's not obvious to me that both collisions generate the same impact force.
 
I have a post in here where I was trying to find the same problem. An older engineer eventually came to me with an *cough ancient cough* handwritten textbook. It had approximations for falling objects based on velocity at impact and static deflection.

I will search for that thread and post what I ended up using, because as said, impact force is quite difficult to actually find. Back in school they would give you a nice impulse - time graph...which obviously doesn't happen in real life.

I found the equations, and here they are:

Load Factors
Static Load: 1.0
Suddenly Applied: 2.0
Suddenly Applied and Reversed: 3.0
Dropped from a height h: k
where k = 1 + ((d² + dv²)^.5)/d
and v = velocity
and d = static deflection
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
8K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K