Is There a Closed-Form Antiderivative for e^(-x^2)?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter kennis
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the question of whether there exists a closed-form antiderivative for the function e^(-x^2). Participants explore the nature of this integral, its relation to elementary and non-elementary functions, and methods of evaluation, including the use of polar coordinates and special functions like the error function (Erf).

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that the integral of e^(-x^2) cannot be expressed using elementary functions and reference the error function (Erf) as a related concept.
  • Others mention that the integral is typically evaluated as a double integral using polar coordinates, citing Fubini's Theorem.
  • One participant notes that while polar coordinates can help with definite integrals, they do not provide a closed form for the indefinite integral.
  • There is a request for a proof demonstrating the impossibility of finding a closed antiderivative for e^(-x^2) using elementary functions, with some participants indicating that such a proof may be lengthy.
  • Another participant points out that the error function can be defined in terms of an integral, which some find disappointing as it does not yield a simple expression.
  • One participant asserts that it is indeed impossible to produce a closed antiderivative, referencing its inclusion in various mathematical treatments of integration.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that the integral cannot be expressed in terms of elementary functions, but there is disagreement regarding the existence of a formal proof and the implications of defining the integral in terms of special functions.

Contextual Notes

The discussion reflects varying levels of familiarity with advanced mathematical concepts, including the definitions of special functions and the techniques of integration. Some assumptions about the nature of functions and integrals are not explicitly stated, which may affect interpretations.

kennis
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
integral of e^(-x^2)dx?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm guessing this can't be defined using elementary functions. Look up functions like Erf(x), Erfi(x), etc.
 
Usually done as a double integral with polar coordinates. I think its Fubini's Theorem.
 
whozum said:
Usually done as a double integral with polar coordinates. I think its Fubini's Theorem.

Here's a nice Wikipedia link to show you the double integral. It's a page on the Gaussian Integral, which is the same integral as yours, but a definite one. It converts

[tex]\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} e^{-x^2}dx[/tex]

to polar coordinates to show how it is evaluated.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It can't be done with elementary functions. Switching to polar coordinates only gives you definite integrals on the intervals from 0 to +/-infinity or from -infinity to infinty. To find the integral in practice one defines a function as that integral. You can find the taylor series for the function by integrating the taylor series of the integrand. This will give you as good an approximation of the function as you want.
 
If you want to find the definite integral, then yes, you use some neat tricks with polar co-ordinates and double integrals. He's just asked for the indefinite integral, and I don't believe that it's an elementary function.
 
Mathematical Proof

Does there exist a proof that says that it is impossible to produce a closed anti derivative of f(x)=e^-x^2? I would like to see it if it does exist. If it is impossible to generate an anti derivative through the use of elementary functions could some one please produce an anti derivative with non-elementary functions?
 
Watts said:
Does there exist a proof that says that it is impossible to produce a closed anti derivative of f(x)=e^-x^2? I would like to see it if it does exist.
I have not seen it myself, but I heard that it is quite long (a dozen pages, I heard)
Watts said:
If it is impossible to generate an anti derivative through the use of elementary functions could some one please produce an anti derivative with non-elementary functions?
Well, there's an answer to that question, but it's kind of disapointing. By definition:
[tex]erf(z) \equiv \frac{2}{\sqrt{\pi}}\int_{0}^{z} e^{t^2}dt[/tex]
So then:
[tex]\int e^{x^2}dx=\frac{\sqrt{\pi}}{2}erf(z) +C[/tex]
Kind of disapointing because it just is basically defined as the answer to the question. But it is not so much different from other functions. It doesn't give exact answers, but niether do most functions. For example look at sin(x). It is defined by an integral, but in fact, in some books the real natural logarithm is defined by:
[tex]\ln{x} \equiv \int_{1}^{x}\frac{1}{t}dt[/tex]
The erf function could as well be defined by a taylor series as some other functions are, by integrating e^(x^2)'s Taylor series.
 
Watts said:
Does there exist a proof that says that it is impossible to produce a closed anti derivative of f(x)=e^-x^2? I would like to see it if it does exist.

Yes, it is impossible. This is important enough that it's in just about every treatment I've seen on "integration in finite terms" (<-buzzwords for google), so there will be many options, such as

http://www.claymath.org/programs/outreach/academy/LectureNotes05/Conrad.pdf
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K