My Report on Experiment & Error Analysis

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on an experiment involving wavelength calculations and error analysis using Bragg's equation. The calculated wavelength is approximately 2.85 cm with an error margin of ±0.03 cm. The spacing between ball bearings was derived using angles and Bragg's equation, resulting in a maximum spacing of 6.4 cm and a minimum of 5.82 cm. The analysis concludes that while errors in angle measurements do not significantly impact the primary results, they could complicate more precise objectives.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Bragg's Law and its applications in physics
  • Familiarity with LaTeX for typesetting equations
  • Basic knowledge of error analysis in experimental physics
  • Proficiency in trigonometric functions and their inverses
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and applications of Bragg's Law in crystallography
  • Learn advanced LaTeX techniques for formatting scientific documents
  • Explore methods for minimizing experimental error in physics experiments
  • Investigate the implications of measurement uncertainty on scientific results
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, experimental researchers, and educators interested in wavelength calculations and error analysis in scientific experiments.

bayan
Messages
202
Reaction score
0
This is my report on an experiment that I have done and I really needed the latex codes to generate the equations. I have done the other parts of the report on other PC.

Do they seem to be ok? (the errors, like the max possible value and min possible value)

no help is really needed, rather I want to know what you think of it, any where I can improve or anything I should drop (unnecesary things)

Thank you!

for [tex]\lambda[/tex]
[tex]\lambda =\frac{18.5}{6.5}[/tex]
[tex]\lambda = 2.85 cm[/tex]


This indicates that the apprxmiate wavelength is [tex]2.85 cm[/tex] with a error margin of [tex]^+_-0.03[/tex]

now to find the spacing between the ball bearings we can use the first angle and [tex]Bragg's equation[/tex] to find the other angles.

[tex]n1[/tex]

[tex]1\lambda =2dSin14^o[/tex]

[tex]d=\frac {2.85}{2Sin14^o}[/tex]

[tex]d= 5.89 cm[/tex]


Now we can find values for other angles that correspond to this equation.

[tex]n2[/tex]

[tex]\theta=Sin^-^1 \frac {5.7}{11.78}[/tex]

[tex]\theta = 28.9^o[/tex]

for [tex]n3[/tex]

[tex]\theta= Sin^-^1 \frac {8.55}{11.78}[/tex]

[tex]\theta = 46.5^o[/tex]

for [tex]n4[/tex]

[tex]\theta = Sin^-^1 \frac {11.4}{11.78}[/tex]

[tex]\theta = 75.4^o[/tex]

there is no [tex]n5[/tex] as the equation makes no scence and there is no value for [tex]sin[/tex] grater than [tex]1[/tex]





Now we come to the errors that were involved in this experiment!

The wavelength was within a error range of [tex]^+_-0.03 cm[/tex].

the angle was read to the nearest degree so it was really [tex]14^o ^+_-1^o[/tex] which then makes the d value lower and higher.

For example the maximum d is when angle was [tex]14^o-1^o=13^o[/tex]

Now we get the new [tex]d=\frac {2.88}{2sin13^o}[/tex] which is [tex]6.4 cm[/tex]

The minimum value obtainable from these sets of result are as followed.

[tex]d=\frac {2.82}{2sin14^o}[/tex] which is [tex]5.82 cm[/tex]

For [tex]n2[/tex] the angle was [tex]28.9^o[/tex] which could have been altered such that maximum is [tex]\theta = sin^-^1 \frac {5.76}{11.64}[/tex] which is about [tex]29.7^o[/tex] and the minimum value could have been
[tex]\theta = Sin^-^1 \frac {5.64}{12.8}[/tex] in which the angle is about [tex]26.1^o[/tex]

This just repeats until the last value of reflection angle.

I will show that the last angle would still exist even with the big error probability.

For Max [tex]\theta[/tex] the [tex]\theta=2.88[/tex] which results [tex]\theta = sin^-^1 \frac {11.52}{11.64}[/tex] which is [tex]81.8^o[/tex] and for Min the angle is [tex]\theta = sin^-^1 \frac {11.28}{12.8}[/tex] which happens to be about [tex]61.8^o[/tex]

So infact the errors did not have a huge impact on the resultst that we were really interested (which is to find how many ball bearings there is!) but if we were to have a diffrent aim those errors would have made it really hard (for example if we wanted to see what exactly the crystall looks like)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Please only post your question once. Locking this one.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
46
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K