Constructing the hockey stick was a clear case of good cause corruption, proven beyond any doubt. After conviction you're allowed to call the suspect the offender.
Anyway, after studying all this
, I think my understanding of all paleoclimate events at the last glacial maximum might be slightly above average. But when it appears that a single hypothesis can fit all those anomalies, a hypothesis that dwarfs any notion of CO2 causing climate changes, then I think that my personal perception can be substantiated that the amount of heating to be attributed to GHG is insignificant.
Meanwhile, in the back yard, we have been holding off the warmers:
To me there are obviously two options. Either accept that global warming is hot air or don't read the discussion. But that would be believing in preconceptial science
Anyway I uploaded the complete discussion as txt document here just in case the NERC site gets reorganised:
92k words, 204 pages text. Advice to right click and save to disk. Then open with a text editor.