View Single Post
twisting_edge
#9
Jan27-07, 11:18 PM
P: 42
Quote Quote by cyrusabdollahi View Post
Whats wrong with the wording?
Think like a normal person (i.e., one who does not recognize that it only comes to rest for an instant of time). Something that has come to rest has ceased moving. By definition, it will not be moving after it has come to rest.

Interesting aside: the quickest way to reconcile the two perspectives is to point out there is no "after" associated with the rest in question. The time spent at rest is zero.