View Single Post
russ_watters
#8
Mar21-09, 02:03 AM
Mentor
P: 22,252
Quote Quote by jreelawg View Post
As I understand it, it was one of the inventions that led to the H.A.A.R.P., and the invention is the very technology used by H.A.A.R.P. to carry out their research.
What leads you to this "understading"?
I don't see how in any way this patent is crackpotery. using terms like significant don't imply crackpot. They probably mean significant as in enough to fulfill a purpose as opposed to a useless amount.
That word implies the imprecise, which only vaguely implies crackpottery. That's tough to detect. What implies crackpottery strongyly is the gibberish that completely fills the claims.