View Single Post
Mar21-09, 02:16 AM
P: 450
Quote Quote by russ_watters View Post
Have a read of the wiki on Eastlund:

Of particular importance is this: So basically, they are saying that he had some interesting ideas that didn't work and were not applied to HAARP. But he got a patent because they were interesting ideas.
I guess I missed that little part. My bad. This is why I brought the discussion to PF. To me it does all sound like gibberish, but that is to be expected.

But I did note that APTI, inc. who holds the patent was contracted to build H.A.A.R.P., so you can see how this can be confusing.