What does that have anything to do with what you were proposing? A "theory" isn't a hand-waving argument. For theory and experiment to "work in tandem", a theory must produce quantitative
predictions and the experiment must be able to measure such quantities! Are you telling me that what you told the OP falls under a category of a "theory"? Really?
You offered a hand-waving argument with no empirical support. This is a fact that you haven't and can't dispute. That's the end of the story.