View Single Post
harrylin
#116
Feb17-12, 01:26 AM
P: 3,185
Quote Quote by bahamagreen View Post
[..] So the stipulation that A and B be at rest wrt each other must be to omit the possibility of relativistic effects.
It wasn't a stipulation. It was just a description of a common way in those days to set up a reference system. And the following claim that "it is essential to have time defined by means of stationary clocks in the stationary system" was basically wrong: nowadays one uses mostly clocks that are moving in the stationary system. But what does that have to do with the topic?