Abstract math prove involwing sets

In summary: but that is not the issue here.think about the points (x,y) on the x-axis. what can you say about them? can you express them in terms of s? same question for points (x,y) on the y-axis.
  • #1
beatka6
21
0

Homework Statement


Let Ts denote the set of points in the x; y plane lying on the square whose
vertices are (-s; s), (s; s), (s;-s), (-s;-s), but not interior to the square. For
example, T1 consists of the vertices (-1; 1), (1; 1), (1;-1), (-1;-1) and the
four line segments joining them. Let
S = union of Ts, where s is an element of positive real numbers
Determine a set J, that is not de ned in terms of unions, that equals S. Prove
that S and J are equal.
Please help. I have no idea how to start that problem. What I figure out is that J=AuBuCuD, where set A={ (x,y)| (x,y)=(s,y), for -s≤y≤s} B={(x,y)| (x,y)=(-s,y), for -s≤y≤s}, C={(x,y)| (x,y)=(x,s), for -s≤x≤s}, D={(x,y)| (x,y)=(x,-s), for -s≤x≤s}
I do not know how to write down set S in different form and how to prove that J=S

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Try explaining in words what points of the plane are contained in [itex]\cup T_s[/itex]. Alternatively, it might be easier to identify what points are NOT contained in the union.
 
  • #3
here are a couple of hints:

suppose (x,y) lies on some square Ts. if (x,y) is in the 4th quadrant, then (x,-y) is in the 1st quadrant, on the same square Ts. if (x,y) is in the 3rd quadrant, then
(-x,-y) is on the same square in the first quadrant, if (x,y) is in the 2nd quadrant, then (-x,y) is in the 1st quadrant.

so you may as well just consider (x,y) in the first quadrant, from symmetry considerations.

now show that if x = y, (x,y) is the corner of some square (which one?), if x > y, (x,y) is on the right vertical side of some square (again: which one, that is...what is s?), and if y < x, then (x,y) is on the top edge of some square (and s is...?).

of course, not every point of the plane is in a quadrant. some points lie on the x-axis, and some points lie on the y-axis. consider these points seperately.

last hint: is a square with sides of length 0 allowed?
 
  • #4
So in my set s cannot equal -s. Would that take care of the problem with 0 side length? But in that problem it does not say that it can't but it says that s is a positive real number, so 0 it is not included because 0 is not negative nor positive.
 
Last edited:
  • #5
you are correct that 0 is not a positive real number.
 

1. What is abstract math and how does it relate to sets?

Abstract math is a branch of mathematics that deals with abstract concepts and structures, rather than real-world applications. Sets are a fundamental concept in abstract math, as they are used to represent collections of objects and are the building blocks for many other mathematical structures.

2. What is a proof in abstract math involving sets?

A proof in abstract math is a logical argument that shows a statement or theorem is true. Involving sets, a proof may use properties and operations of sets to demonstrate the validity of a statement or to show the relationship between two or more sets.

3. What are some common operations and properties of sets used in abstract math proofs?

Some common operations and properties of sets used in abstract math proofs include union, intersection, complement, and subsets. These operations and properties allow for the manipulation and comparison of sets, which are essential in constructing proofs.

4. How do abstract math proofs involving sets differ from other mathematical proofs?

Abstract math proofs involving sets often require a more abstract and logical approach compared to other mathematical proofs. This is because sets themselves are abstract concepts, and their properties and operations must be carefully understood and applied in a proof. Additionally, abstract math proofs may not have real-world applications, unlike other mathematical proofs.

5. Are there any tips for successfully understanding and constructing abstract math proofs involving sets?

One tip for understanding and constructing abstract math proofs involving sets is to first fully grasp the definitions and properties of sets. It is also helpful to familiarize oneself with common proof techniques and strategies, such as proof by contradiction or proof by induction. Additionally, practicing with a variety of examples and seeking assistance from a mentor or fellow mathematician can also aid in understanding and constructing abstract math proofs involving sets.

Similar threads

  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
508
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
454
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
804
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
251
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
14
Views
513
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
495
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
922
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
1K
Back
Top