Prove ##a + b = b + a## using Peano postulates

  • Thread starter issacnewton
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Peano
  • #1
issacnewton
1,000
29
Homework Statement
Prove ##a + b = b + a## using Peano postulates
Relevant Equations
Peano postulates
Following is a set of Peano postulates I am using as defined in the book "Th real numbers and real analysis" by Ethan Bloch.

There exists a set ##\mathbb{N}## with an element ##1 \in \mathbb{N}## and a function ##s: \mathbb{N} \rightarrow \mathbb{N} ## that satisfy the following three properties.

1) There is no ##n \in \mathbb{N}## such that ##s(n) = 1##

2) The function ##s## is injective.

3) Let ##G \subseteq \mathbb{N}## be a set. Suppose that ##1 \in G##, and that if ##g \in G## then ##s(g) \in G##. Then ## G = \mathbb{N} ##I have to prove the Commutative Law for addition ## a + b = b + a## using Peano postulates, given that ##a, b\in \mathbb{N}##. Now define the set

$$ G = \{ x \in \mathbb{N} |\forall\; y \in \mathbb{N} \quad (x + y) = (y + x) \} $$

I have proven previously, that for ## a \in \mathbb{N}##, we have,

$$ 1 + a = s(a) = a + 1 \cdots\cdots (1) $$

So, for some ##y \in \mathbb{N} ##, we get ## 1 + y = y + 1 ##. That proves that ## 1 \in G ##. Now, suppose that ## r \in G##. This means that

$$ \forall\; y \in \mathbb{N} \quad (r + y) = (y + r) \cdots\cdots (2) $$

We need to prove that

$$ \forall\; y \in \mathbb{N} \quad s(r) + y = y + s(r) $$

Let ## y \in \mathbb{N} ## be arbitrary. From ##(2)##, we get ## (r + y) = (y + r)##. It follows that ##s(r + y) = s(y + r) ##. Now, addition function is defined as follows in this book

There is a unique binary operation ##+: \mathbb{N} \times \mathbb{N} \to \mathbb{N} ## that satisfies the following two properties for all ##n, m \in \mathbb{N} ##

$$ n + 1 = s(n) $$
$$ n + s(m) = s(n + m) $$

Using this, we get, ## s(r + y) = y + s(r)##. Now, using ##(1)##, we have, ## 1 + (r + y) = y + s(r) ##. I have also previously proven Associative Law for Addition. So, using that, we get, ## (1 + r) + y = y + s(r) ##. Again using ##(1)##, this becomes ## s(r) + y = y + s(r) ##. Since ## y \in \mathbb{N} ## is arbitrary, ## s(r) \in G##. So, for some ## r \in G## it implies that ## s(r) \in G##. From Peano postulates, this means that ## G = \mathbb{N} ##.

Now let ##a, b \in \mathbb{N}## be arbitrary. So, ## a \in G##. It follows that ## (a + b) = (b + a) ##

Is this a sound proof ?
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
issacnewton said:
So, for some ##y \in \mathbb{N} ##, we get ## 1 + y = y + 1 ##. That proves that ## 1 \in G ##.
Be more precise. The equality ##1+y=y+1## must hold for all ##y\in\mathbb N##, then it follows that ##1\in G##. You can show the identity holds by induction using ##s(1+n) = 1+s(n)##.
issacnewton said:
Using this, we get, ## s(r + y) = y + s(r)##. Now, using ##(1)##, we have, ## 1 + (r + y) = y + s(r) ##. I have also previously proven Associative Law for Addition.
Show explicitly how ##1+(r+y) = y+s(r)## follows from associativity. Otherwise, you make a remark about associativity and it's up to the reader to realise that's how you concluded that equality. Leave that ambiguous style to math authors, you have the luxury of writing things out in detail.
issacnewton said:
Since ## y \in \mathbb{N} ## is arbitrary, ## s(r) \in G##. So, for some ## r \in G## it implies that ## s(r) \in G##.
You have already fixed ##r\in G##, there is no need to requantify it. It's confusing the reader.One might condense the induction argument as follows, label the equalities and explain them separately. Keep things concise. It holds that ##1\in G##. Let ##r\in G## and ##y\in\mathbb N##. We have that
[tex]
s(r)+y \overset{1.}= (1+r)+y \overset{2.}= 1+(r+y) \overset{3.}= (r+y)+1 \overset{4.}= (y+r)+1 \overset{5.}= y + s(r).
[/tex]
  1. Definition of ##s(n)##
  2. Associativity of ##+##
  3. ##1\in G##
  4. Induction assumption
  5. Associativity of ##+## and definition of ##s(n)##
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes PeroK
  • #3
issacnewton said:
Is this a sound proof ?
Thanks
I agree with @nuuskur. This isn't as good as your previous proof of the associativity of ##+##. You should try to be more positive and direct.
 
  • #4
Thanks nuuskur. I will modify the proof.
 

1. How do you prove that a + b = b + a using Peano postulates?

To prove that a + b = b + a using Peano postulates, we can use the commutative property of addition. This property states that the order of the numbers being added does not affect the result. Therefore, we can rearrange the terms a + b to b + a without changing the value of the equation.

2. What are the Peano postulates?

The Peano postulates are a set of five axioms that define the natural numbers. They include the existence of a first number (1), the concept of successor, the principle of mathematical induction, the commutative and associative properties of addition, and the existence of a unique additive identity (0).

3. Can you prove the commutative property of addition using Peano postulates?

Yes, the commutative property of addition can be proved using Peano postulates. As mentioned before, the property states that the order of the numbers being added does not affect the result. By using the successor function and the principle of mathematical induction, we can show that this property holds true for all natural numbers.

4. Why is it important to prove the commutative property of addition using Peano postulates?

Proving the commutative property of addition using Peano postulates is important because it establishes a fundamental property of numbers. It shows that addition is a well-defined operation that follows certain rules, and it allows us to confidently use addition in mathematical equations and proofs.

5. Are the Peano postulates the only way to prove that a + b = b + a?

No, there are other ways to prove that a + b = b + a. For example, we can use the commutative property of addition in the real numbers or use algebraic manipulations to show that the two expressions are equal. However, using Peano postulates is a rigorous and fundamental approach that helps establish the properties of addition in the natural numbers.

Similar threads

  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
694
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
462
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
523
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
276
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
579
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
519
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
506
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
553
Back
Top