View Single Post
twofish-quant
twofish-quant is offline
#5
Mar6-12, 09:23 AM
P: 6,863
The quality of the articles doesn't seem to be very high. There are a few articles here and there that don't look awful, but on the whole the quality is pretty dreadful. The only point of peer review is for quality control, and they don't seem to be doing a good job at that.

Personally, I don't really see the point of this journal. Anything worth reading is going to be at the Los Alamos Preprint server or ADS.

In my opinion it is a great idea to disseminate astronomical research for free. Too many times I have been stopped by a demand to pay first to read some interesting paper.
You do know about http://adswww.harvard.edu/ and http://www.arxiv.org/ ?