View Single Post
Greg Bernhardt
#1
Feb15-13, 10:02 AM
Admin
Greg Bernhardt's Avatar
P: 9,521
In the case of detecting muscle damage, would there be any reason to choose a CT scan over MRI? I know MRI takes longer and can be more expensive, but the CT scan radiation seems to be high enough to try and avoid it if possible. fyi, I am in communication with a doctor, but he's taking ages to get back to me :)
Phys.Org News Partner Medical research news on Phys.org
Sleep apnea treatment is effective for older people
Social inequalities in salt consumption remain
Everest expedition provides first evidence of effects of altitude on blood pressure