View Single Post
ZapperZ
#3
Mar15-05, 06:20 PM
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
ZapperZ's Avatar
P: 29,238
Quote Quote by Andrew Mason
This article describes detection of cosmic rays with unbelievable energies:

This is a proton with 20 joules of energy - about the same energy as a well driven golf ball in mid-flight.

The thought occurred to me that (if we can figure out where these particles are coming from, which appears to be a goal of the project) perhaps we should be building some big particle detectors for SkyLab rather than building bigger terrestrial particle accelerators.

AM
People have wanted to build a high energy physics experiment using cosmic particles for at least a decade now. The problem that most of them seem to overlook is the complexity and the SIZE of the particle detectors! Have you seen CDF at Fermilab? It's the size of a HOUSE! And not only that, it is built with such precision and such utterly ridiculous tolerence, I cannot imagine it being built in space, or being rattled off upon liftoff to be put in position.

The other issue being the fact that you cannot control where these particles are coming from, and so the ability to control the trajectory is almost non-existent. Couple that with the uncertainty in the luminosity of the particle you want to collide, and we have way too many unknowns to convince the taxpayers to fork over the gazillion dollars to pay for such thing (after all, they've already been suckered into paying for the ISS with practically no science value whatsoever in return).

So yes, you do get the energy for almost nothing, but you also lose a lot of other control and capabilities in return.

Zz.