View Single Post
Dec9-05, 10:41 AM
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
P: 2,265
Quote Quote by DocToxyn
Count me in. I would think that at least a week would be required to get all interested parties to download, read and critique the papers, so perhaps only one new title per week. The subsequent discussions would progress as far, or as long, as the subject and/or reader interest support them.
Yeah, this is more or less what I had in mind. Q_Goest suggests we should follow a slower pace, and cotarded seemed to imply a faster pace. Anyone else want to chime in?

Also, I'm still wondering about the legality of posting images from articles that one needs a paid or university subscription in order to access online (of course, if we did so, we would provide references and so on). Perhaps DocToxyn or Moonbear would have some good insight into this?