image
Physics Forums Logo
image
image
* Register * Upgrade Blogs Library Staff Rules Mark Forums Read
image
image   image
image

Go Back   Physics Forums > PF Lounge > General Discussion


Reply

image Attention Future Engineers! Share It Thread Tools Search this Thread image
Old Jul14-06, 10:19 PM       Last edited by Cyrus; Jul14-06 at 11:03 PM..            #1
Cyrus
 
Cyrus's Avatar

Cyrus is Online:
Posts: 4,335
Exclamation Attention Future Engineers!

My fluids final is over; however, I still have to complete my project for the course due this Monday. The project is a 10 page research paper on the bladder and prostate.

Background

In a healthy male, the prostate does not restrict the diameter of the urethra. This means the urethral diameter is more or less a constant along its length and has an average size of about 6mm. When the sphincter muscle relaxes, it acts like an open valve between the bladder and the urethra, shown in fig 1. Urine can then flow out through the hydrostatic pressure of the urine inside the bladder. People who have trouble with their sphincter muscle usually suffer from incontinence. This is urinary leakage caused by the inability of the sphincter to tighten and fully restrict the flow of urine from the bladder.


Fig.1

In addition to relaxation of the sphincter muscle, two pressures are exerted to increase the flow-rate of urine through the urethra. The first pressure is called the detrusor pressure. This pressure is caused by the layers of muscles lining the bladder itself. The secondary pressure is caused by the external pressure of your body. This pressure occurs when you move your torso, cough etc. These pressures increase the internal pressure in your bladder, causing a larger flow of urine.


Fig 2.


When the prostate enlarges, it constricts the opening of the urethra. Because the prostate is enclosed within the body, it cannot expand radially outward; consequently, it expands inward and causes a restriction within the urethra, Fig 2.

Design Project


Our project is to design a working bladder where we can vary the detrusor and external pressures separately. We must then investigate the effects of the prostate and the required pressures to cause urinary flow. From there, we can scale our results from our larger bladder to make conclusions about a real patient’s bladder.

The Over-Engineer

Unfortunately, there is one guy in our group who I call the Overengineer. The Overengineer is the guy who takes his right hand and goes all the way over his head to say look, I can touch my left ear.


He said to us two weeks ago he would have a working bladder system made by last weekend. He showed it to us last Friday, and it looked iffy. It was made from a balloon covered in layer upon layer of liquid latex. Not only that, the prostate was set up so that it was constricting the bladder and not the urethra. The prostate was a second balloon around the bottom neck of the first balloon. He told us that the first balloon they made failed because when they emptied it the latex touched itself in the interior and fused….. I knew this was going to be a bad idea. We tried to get it to work, but gave up.

If you first don’t succeed, try try to over engineer again!


Okay, so the next day, last Saturday, rolls around and we all meet up again. This time he comes with a new bladder system. Only this time, it's a 2.5 GALLON bladder bag. This monstrosity is covered in a plastic bag and hooked up to a vacuum supply. The goal was to have the vacuum suck the back and increase the flow rate (detrusor muscles). Weights were then be hung from sides of the bag to increase the pressure and cause the external body pressures……We hooked the bladder up to the shop vacuum supply, and guess what, it wont work! It's not enough vacuum to see any effects on this big bladder, and we had like 30-50mm of Hg!

Now, let's just take a step back and think about this for one second. Does a 2.5 GALLON bladder seem REASONABLE to anyone? It better not!


Not only was the vacuum not working, the prostate was a bicycle tire wrapped around the bottom of this big bladder bag. The weight of the water above the bicycle tire was so great that it was literally pushing the tire off of the bladder bag. Because the bicycle tire was not restricted to expand outward like a real body, it expanded radially outward and did NOTHING to restrict the flow!

We wasted the ENTIRE last weekend fiddling with this set up, when we could have been studying for the final exam.

So after our final exam on Wednesday, we get together to talk about how we are going to get this thing working. He tells us, “I have a solution!” He shows us a one way threaded valve that only allows flow in one direction after a certain amount of pressure.

Mr. Over-engineer is hard at work! This added complication has NOTHING to do with making the experiment work.

Say Hello to Mr. Practical!


So today we decide to make a new bladder system. This time, we designed it without Mr. Over-engineer. The three of us that designed it included me, an older student who is retired from the military, and another student who used to be in construction and mechanic school.

All you engineering students should take notes, right now. I call these guys, Mr. Practical.



Together, we decide to get a small bladder. The smaller, the better. We go to REI, a sporting equipment store and buy a 1.5Liter bladder bag, the smallest we could find. Next, we go to home depot. We find a nice clear plastic container, (3 for $10) and decide to use this as our pressure vessel. (LOOK, NO CONSTRUCTING A PRESSURE VESSLE!). We then try to find a sealant to make the lid air tight. The ex-military guy said we should use silicon sealant, but the mechanic said no, we should buy a hot glue gun and hot glue it because sealant takes too long to dry. Mr. Practical is hard at work. Since I don’t own a hot glue gun, I said sure I will buy one because I can use it at home after the project is over.

Things are looking promising!

We took the box and cut some simple round holes into it on a drill press. We then thread on a shop air nipple, a pressure gage, and an exit port for the bladder hose to exit and drain out so we can measure the flow rate.


We then pressurized the system and found it to have minimal leaks. In fact, because we are hooked up to a shop air supply, we can leave the valve partially open and not even worry about sealing the leaks!

We set it up and by god it worked the first time! With no pressure, the bladder had a flow rate of 23mL/s, with pressure, we doubled that rate to 43mL/s!

Success! Mr. Practical’s practicality paid off.

Make this your motto

As my mentor used to say:

"Good enough, is good enough."

and my personal favorite,

Keep it simple, stupid!

Tomorrow we are going to modify the bladder system to include the detrusor pressure of the bladder muscle.

So get to the point already!

Point of this story, DO NOT OVER ENGINEER STUFF. The simplest design that does the job is the BEST design, ALWAYS!

Remember Occam's razor:

entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem

In english:

entities should not be multiplied beyond necessity.

Side: My professor works on fluid flow for biological systems at NIH. He told me he is looking for a small group of 5 students to do an actual design and research to construct a medical device for a prostate as part of a design competition among other colleges. Unfortunately, I don’t have any time with my upcoming schedule, too bad.
  Reply With Quote
Old Jul14-06, 10:45 PM                  #2
wolram
 
wolram's Avatar

wolram is Offline:
Posts: 3,562
Blog Entries: 1
Recognitions:
PF Contributor PF Contributor
Well done Cyrus and team
  Reply With Quote
Old Jul14-06, 11:01 PM                  #3
Moonbear
 
Moonbear's Avatar

Moonbear is Offline:
Posts: 11,761
Recognitions:
PF Contributor PF Contributor
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Retired Staff Retired Staff
A 2.5 gallon bladder?! At least he's in engineering school and not med school.

By the way, if it matters, real bladders are fairly thin tissue. Think Saran wrap, not hot water bottle. The latex balloon might have been a good approximation, if not overinflated, but not with added layers of latex.
  Reply With Quote
Old Jul14-06, 11:05 PM       Last edited by Cyrus; Jul14-06 at 11:14 PM..            #4
Cyrus
 
Cyrus's Avatar

Cyrus is Online:
Posts: 4,335
Yeah, 2.5 Gallons. I guess he decided to scale it up to an elephants...

It's ok if the walls are thicker because it’s larger scale than the actual bladder.

But yea, this guy is just amazing. He will make the simplest thing so overly complicated its ridiculous at times.

He's doing space systems, so watch your head for falling satellites.

Originally Posted by wolram
Well done Cyrus and team
I would think someone with as much incontinence as you would be interested in this thread, you old fart.
  Reply With Quote
image image
Reply
Thread Tools


Similar Threads for: Attention Future Engineers!
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Attention: Moonbear Philosophy 0 Feb28-07 09:03 PM
Electrical Engineers vs Computer Engineers Nothing000 Academic Guidance 16 Jan22-06 12:28 PM
I need some serious adivice for my future..engineers, math people please help me :( jayncanada Academic Guidance 17 Oct22-05 02:57 AM
Future of Electrical Engineers Naeem Academic Guidance 7 Apr21-05 11:07 AM
Attention Pattielli Philosophy 1 Jul1-04 06:22 PM

Powered by vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. © 2009 Physics Forums
Sciam | physorgPhysorg.com Science News Partner
image
image   image