Dopey Question about Bell's theorem.


by NateTG
Tags: bell, dopey, theorem
NateTG
NateTG is offline
#1
Dec4-03, 01:27 PM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
P: 2,538
For context I'm looking at:
http://www.mtnmath.com/whatrh/node80.html

Bell's theorem suggests that a hidden variable λ cannot exist, but, at least the version above makes the assumption that Λ (the set of all posible values of λ ) is a measurable domain s.t.
[tex]\int_{\Lambda} f(\lambda)d\lambda[/tex]

is well-defined.

Is there a version of Bell's theorem that does not rely on the ability to integrate the probability function of λ?
Phys.Org News Partner Physics news on Phys.org
The hemihelix: Scientists discover a new shape using rubber bands (w/ video)
Mapping the road to quantum gravity
Chameleon crystals could enable active camouflage (w/ video)
NateTG
NateTG is offline
#2
Dec4-03, 05:46 PM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
P: 2,538
Found it. Apparently Bell does assume that the hidden variable is in a measurable domain, and Pitowksy produced a model based on unmeasurable sets that avoids the issue.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Bell's Theorem Advanced Physics Homework 2
Fun question RE: Bell's Theorem Quantum Physics 50
Why Bell's Theorem is wrong. Quantum Physics 9
Intro to Bell's Theorem Quantum Physics 1
Bell's theorem General Physics 27