Recognitions:
Homework Help

For context I'm looking at:
http://www.mtnmath.com/whatrh/node80.html

Bell's theorem suggests that a hidden variable &lambda; cannot exist, but, at least the version above makes the assumption that &Lambda; (the set of all posible values of &lambda; ) is a measurable domain s.t.
$$\int_{\Lambda} f(\lambda)d\lambda$$

is well-defined.

Is there a version of Bell's theorem that does not rely on the ability to integrate the probability function of &lambda;?
 PhysOrg.com physics news on PhysOrg.com >> Is there an invisible tug-of-war behind bad hearts and power outages?>> Penetrating the quantum nature of magnetism>> Rethinking the universe: Groundbreaking theory proposed in 1997 suggests a 'multiverse'
 Recognitions: Homework Help Science Advisor Found it. Apparently Bell does assume that the hidden variable is in a measurable domain, and Pitowksy produced a model based on unmeasurable sets that avoids the issue.

 Similar discussions for: Dopey Question about Bell's theorem. Thread Forum Replies Advanced Physics Homework 2 Quantum Physics 50 Quantum Physics 9 Quantum Physics 1 General Physics 27