Originally Posted by MeJennifer
Well perhaps I miss something.
Once the first Kohonen network "clusters" the significant statistical coincidences of the input neurons, what could the second one possibly improve on that?
|
Actually, I'm still feeling in the dark, trying to figure which is the right way to have it implemented.
I read a few papers and came to know about catastrophic interference, which is the reason why some researchers have proposed dual-network memory models to resolve this problem.
Then I came to wonder about how the first network (hippocampus) could possibly transfer or "teach" the second network (neocortex). I read that Robins proposed the idea of pseudo-patterns. From what I understand, this means creating random inputs to feed to the artificial hippocampus. These pseudo patterns could then be used to train neocortex.
Thus, I had thought of using these two Kohonen networks (maybe a wrong idea), whereby the first one learns and then transfers to the 2nd.
If there're any experts in this area around, I'd appreciate any comments.