# Sea of electrons in metals

by Brock
Tags: electrons, metals
 Share this thread:
 P: 39 Is it a "floating" sea of electrons in metals? meaning they are not restricted to a spot relative to the atoms, but they just "float" around as long as it's in the metal, and the charge is almost perfectly level throughout the metal. (I doubt it would be absolutly entropicly level) Arn't electrons pulled by gravity? So a metal pole being held up vertically would stay there because the atoms are "locked" into place with relation to eachother, but the floating electrons are not, so would they fall to the bottom edge of the pole? This effect might be very very small because the entropy of the charge forces would be much stronger then gravity.
 P: 27 To your first question, yes, I think they do just 'float' around in the metal. As for your second question, I'm pretty sure that gravity is so insignificant as to be meaningless on the atomic scale. The other forces (electromagnetic, strong nuclear, weak nuclear) are many orders of magnitude stronger. So no, the electrons will not 'fall' to the bottom of the pole. If they did, you'd get shocked every time you touched a pole ;)
HW Helper
P: 1,273
 Quote by Ariste To your first question, yes, I think they do just 'float' around in the metal. As for your second question, I'm pretty sure that gravity is so insignificant...
In this case you are right since the two energy scales that should be compared are the typical
energies of free electrons in the fermi sea versus typical gravitational potential energies. Thus we are comparing a number on the order of 10 eV (typical fermi energy) to the number
$$m_e g h$$
where h is the height.

In order for the gravitational potential energy to be comparable one would need
$$h \approx 10000 \textrm{meters}$$

If, on the other hand, we were talking about a free gas of, say, air molecules instead of electrons, then we would compare to kT (much less than typical E_f usually) and find a height of much less. That's why one does have to take gravitational potential energy into account in the thermodynamics of air in the atmosphere, for example... but for the case of electrons in a rod one can safely ignore gravity except in the case of a very very very long rod.

Cheers.

Emeritus
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
P: 11,155
Sea of electrons in metals

 Quote by Brock Is it a "floating" sea of electrons in metals? meaning they are not restricted to a spot relative to the atoms, but they just "float" around as long as it's in the metal, and the charge is almost perfectly level throughout the metal.
This is only true within a Jellium model where the fixed positive charge is assumed to be uniformly distributed. In reality, the charge density is different depending on whether you are near a lattice site or far from it (i.e., since the underlying potential is not invariant under continuous spatial translations, neither should you anticipate the resulting charge density to be).

See also:
Bloch states
Nearly free electron approximation
Tight binding model
 P: 39 Thanks. I wounder if spinning a star shaped (or anything that comes to points on the outer radious) piece of metal, at extremely fast rmp would cause a voltage difference from the centre of the spin to the outer edge of the spin. Or are the other forces that keep the electrons still far too stronge to overcome? Well ofcourse there would be some voltage, though maybe unmeasureably small.
 HW Helper P: 1,273 that's an interesting question, but again I think that the frequency would have to be quite high indeed to observe any effect.
 Emeritus Sci Advisor PF Gold P: 11,155 I'd imagine that would take tangential velocities comparable to the Fermi velocity (~106 m/s) before you notice much change in the charge density.

 Related Discussions High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics 12 Atomic, Solid State, Comp. Physics 3 Special & General Relativity 18 Atomic, Solid State, Comp. Physics 6