HELP! Why CS is topological? Why BF is topological?


by astros
Tags: topological
astros
astros is offline
#1
Feb19-08, 11:31 AM
P: 22
Hello,
I know that the CS Lagrangian is a topological invariant, in the sense that it does not depend on the connection we choose. OK, but a TFT is a field theory whose Lagrangian and all other observables do not depend on the metric, a connection in general is not uniquely defined by a metric! Then how can I see CS theory as topological? Another problem, CS Lagrangian is a 3-forme, normally; a Lagrangian must be a scalar!? After that, can I see that CS is topological by showing that the number of constraints is equal to the number of degrees of freedom? If yes HOW! The same for BF! Please help me RANI NíNAGER!!!
Phys.Org News Partner Physics news on Phys.org
Information storage for the next generation of plastic computers
Scientists capture ultrafast snapshots of light-driven superconductivity
Progress in the fight against quantum dissipation
astros
astros is offline
#2
Feb21-08, 12:41 PM
P: 22
nobody!!!


Register to reply

Related Discussions
topological aspects of QHE General Physics 0
topological aspects of QHE General Physics 0
topological aspects of QHE General Physics 0
A topological question General Astronomy 12
Topological defects General Astronomy 1