"External" clock synchronization and sbsolute motionby bernhard.rothenstein Tags: clock, external, motion, sbsolute, synchronization 

#1
Nov2808, 12:08 AM

P: 997

The “external” clock synchronization goes as follows: Consider that the clocks C(x) located at the points M(x) of the OX axis of I inertial reference frame read all zero (t=0) as a result of a standard (Einstein) clock synchronization procedure. Let C’ be the wrist watch of an observer R’ who moves with constant speed V in the positive direction of the OX axis. Clock C’ is adjusted to read t’=0 when it passes in front of a clock C(x) reading zero as well. The trip of clock C’ lasts dt’ when measured by R’ being a proper time interval but lasts dt when measured by observers from I being a coordinate time interval. The two time intervals are related by the time dilation formula
dt’=dt/g (1) g representing the Lorentz factor. Equation (1) enables R’ to find out his speed knowing dt and dt’. Knowing that the relativity principle could be stated as: “All physical laws are the same in any inertial reference frame, no inertial reference frame is privileged i.e. distinguishable from the others by means of “internal” empirical evidences” we could say that (1) is an experiment in which the moving observer R’ is not “confined” in his rest frame and so it is out of the requirements of the relativity principle. The way in which the reference frames are chosen is arbitrary. Is there some error above? 



#2
Nov2808, 01:35 AM

Mentor
P: 15,571





#3
Nov2808, 02:02 AM

P: 997

I think that the condition you mention is not a compulsory requirement. 



#4
Nov2808, 06:51 AM

Sci Advisor
PF Gold
P: 1,806

"External" clock synchronization and sbsolute motion
The clocks in the two frames have been synchronised in two different ways.
The C clocks are synchronised by an "internal" method (Einstein sync) which can be carried out in a "closed box" without knowledge of any other frames. The C' clocks have been synchronised by an "external" method which depends on knowledge of the C clocks. As the two coordinate systems have been set up in different ways, there's no reason why the laws of physics should take the same mathematical form in the two coordinate systems. The principle of relativity has not been broken because the two observers are not using the same method to make their calculations. And it's not surprising that R' can work out his velocity relative to I because he made use of I to sync his clocks. 



#5
Nov2808, 07:44 AM

Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks
P: 26,167

(1) is correct for the time dilation formula for C´ viewed by C, but you cannot use the same process to get the time dilation formula for C viewed by C´, because, as Vanadium 50 says … (and R´ is in his rest frame … I don't understand how you could think he might not be ) 



#6
Nov2808, 07:57 AM

Mentor
P: 16,473

However, bernhard is correct. If instead of a single wristwatch worn by R' we used a system of clocks and rods at rest wrt R', and if those clocks were all synchronized by using the approach bernhard suggests for R', then those rods and clocks would form a new coordinate system I'. In this new coordinate system the formula (1) could indeed be used to calculate coordinate time dilation, however the laws of physics would not take their standard form in this coordinate system as, e.g. the oneway speed of light would be anisotropic.
I don't understand why bernhard would want to construct such a coordinate system, but he could. 



#7
Nov2808, 09:50 PM

P: 997





#8
Nov2808, 09:57 PM

P: 997

t=t'/g (1) a consequence of time dilation the equation x'=g(xVt) (2) a consequence of length contraction. For me the approach has a high pedagogical value,illustrating the difference between experiment performed confined in in an inertial reference frame and experiment performed having an outlook to an experiment performed in an other one. 



#9
Nov2908, 04:24 AM

Mentor
P: 16,473





#10
Nov2908, 05:27 AM

P: 997

The transformation equations have a large coverage in the literature of the subject. 


Register to reply 
Related Discussions  
Difference between "Identical", "Equal", "Equivalent"  Calculus & Beyond Homework  9  
The "biological clock" thing  General Discussion  21  
Einstein's resolution of the "clock paradox"  Special & General Relativity  32  
Question about the "light clock"  General Physics  19 