# Ground state energies

 P: 364 What regulates the ground state energy of a hydrogen atom? Why is it constant (more or less)?
 P: 173 check perturbation theories ;)
 P: 57 hi, as far as I know there are theoretical relations by which you calculate the ground state of a system. Like Kohn-Sham equation and ... The density functional theory texts may help you. The atomic systems usually converge to a ground state energy which is unique, but theoretically very hard to calculate.... Hope it helped. Good luck!
 P: 364 Ground state energies Thanks for the post. I was mostly wondering which force regulates the ground state, and if it is related to the Lorentz force.
 Mentor P: 11,749 The ground state energy of hydrogen comes from the solution of Schrödinger's equation for the Coulomb (electric) potential energy function of the electron and proton.
Emeritus
PF Gold
P: 29,238
 Quote by nuby What regulates the ground state energy of a hydrogen atom? Why is it constant (more or less)?
What exactly do you mean by "regulate"?

Zz.
P: 364
 Quote by ZapperZ What exactly do you mean by "regulate"? Zz.
"Holds" the binding force (potential?) at around -27.2 eV , and electron kinetic energy at +13.6 eV.
Emeritus
PF Gold
P: 29,238
 Quote by nuby "Holds" the binding force (potential) at around -27.2 eV , and electron kinetic energy at +13.6 eV.
Binding force potential? Kinetic energy?

Even in the simplest Rydberg atom model, is it not obvious that we have a Coulombic potential? I mean, you have a positive nucleus, and a negative electron. Is there something here that I'm missing?

Zz.
P: 364
 Quote by ZapperZ Binding force potential? Kinetic energy? Even in the simplest Rydberg atom model, is it not obvious that we have a Coulombic potential? I mean, you have a positive nucleus, and a negative electron. Is there something here that I'm missing? Zz.
That works too, the Coulombic potential of ground state. What controls it?
Emeritus
PF Gold
P: 29,238
 Quote by nuby That works too, the Coulombic potential of ground state. How is it determined?
Er... this is classical E&M. If you have a spherically symmetry + charge at the origin, what is the electrostatic potential at point r?

Zz.
 P: 364 I meant "what controls it" .. I edited my post right after you responded.
Emeritus
PF Gold
P: 29,238
 Quote by nuby I meant "what controls it" .. I edited my post right after you responded.
Control?

This is meant to clarify?

What's the issue that you have with electrostatic potential?

Zz.
PF Gold
P: 293
 Quote by nuby "Holds" the binding force (potential?) at around -27.2 eV , and electron kinetic energy at +13.6 eV.
I am guessing you mean that why does the electron not gain more then 13.6 ev of kinetic energy as it falls closer to the proton?

On the lower end, I dont think that the electron needs to keep at least 13.6 ev of kinetic energy, the electrons kinetic energy can be much lower and I think usually would be. Hydrogen gas with electrons buzzing around with 13.6 ev of energy would be considered very "hot".
 P: 364 these might make more sense. 1.) Why does the electron energy remain constant in ground state hydrogen, as well as the average size of the atom? 2.) Why don't protons and anti-protons interact like protons and electrons? Thanks in advance
Emeritus
PF Gold
P: 29,238
 Quote by nuby these might make more sense. 1.) Why does the electron energy remain constant in ground state hydrogen, as well as the average size of the atom?
Because when you set it up quantum mechanically, you get solutions to the Hamiltonian that corresponds to the "stationary" solutions that you get when you solve the classical Hamiltonian. Based on the physics that we know, this is the definition of the ground state.

 2.) Why don't protons and anti-protons interact like protons and electrons? Thanks in advance
Because a proton is a baryon and an electron is a lepton, where is a proton/anti-proton are both baryon and the physics indicates that they are "mirror image" of each other, separated only by a few symmetry operations. You can't do the same with proton and electrons, which are both matter and not even identical to each other in many respects.

Have you looked at basic physics text (or even the internet) to actually do your own legwork on the obvious difference between these two sets of conditions that you have asked? I mean, I'm sure you would have realized that proton-antiproton are more alike to each other than proton-electron. They do at least teach such a thing in high school, don't they, regarding the "scale" of things, such as the different in mass between proton and electron?

Zz.
P: 364
 Quote by ZapperZ Because a proton is a baryon and an electron is a lepton, where is a proton/anti-proton are both baryon and the physics indicates that they are "mirror image" of each other, separated only by a few symmetry operations. You can't do the same with proton and electrons, which are both matter and not even identical to each other in many respects. Zz.
So the forces between the two leptons (electrons / positrons) behave a lot differently, than between leptons and baryons.
 Emeritus Sci Advisor PF Gold P: 29,238 You notice that you have changed topic. I still want to know why you are having problems with a simple, straight-forward electrostatic potential. Zz.
 P: 364 I guess I'm wondering if the ground state electrostatic potential (or electron) interacts with the zero-point-field, and if the ZPF dictates the ground state energy?

 Related Discussions Advanced Physics Homework 5 Advanced Physics Homework 1 Quantum Physics 20