Register to reply

Double integral/change of variable

Share this thread:
hnh
#1
Mar11-09, 10:06 AM
P: 7
Hello, it may look long but if written down-
is really quite short, I have only included a detailed explanation to try and be more clear.
My question is; I am doing a change of variable which doesn't seem to 'fit' the theory of finding the jacobian to make
the transformation. It seems to me that I make a straightforward substitution:

The integral is \int\int_A f'(t) ln( f(x) - f(t) + t - x)dxdt In my area, x <= t so the order cannot be switched.

I make the following change of variable:

Let r=x-f(x) and h(r) = x and let s=t-f(t) and h(s)=t
notice that this gives f(x)=h(r)-r and f(t)=h(s)-s, hence f'(t)dxdt = dxf'(t)dt = h'(r)dr(h'(s) - 1)ds=h'(r)(h'(s)-1)drds.

Now the integral appears to be

\int\int_A' ln(r-s)h'(r)(h'(s)-1)drds

Is this correct-can I do this change of variable without actually doing the jacobian. It seems that I do not actually
have the integral \int\int f(x,y) dxdt in this case to make the transformation with the jacobian so I am wondering
if there is anything wrong with the way I have done this?
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on Phys.org
Climate change increases risk of crop slowdown in next 20 years
Researcher part of team studying ways to better predict intensity of hurricanes
New molecule puts scientists a step closer to understanding hydrogen storage
BobbyBear
#2
Mar12-09, 03:07 PM
P: 162
I think it would work because your r and s variables are not each one dependent on x and t at the same time, so it's like you're doing two one-variable changes, so you really are doing the Jacobian thingy even if you don't realise that you are, if you know what I mean. You have:


[tex] r(x) \equiv x -f(x) \ \ \rightarrow \ \ x=h(r); [/tex]
[tex] s(t) \equiv t-f(t) \ \ \rightarrow \ \ t=h(s); [/tex]

[tex] f(x)=x-r(x) \ \ \rightarrow \ \ f(x(r)) \equiv F(r) = h(r)-r; [/tex]
[tex] f(t)=t-s(t) \ \ \rightarrow \ \ f(t(s)) \equiv F(s) = h(s)-s; [/tex]


The Jacobian would be:

[tex]

J = det \left(
\begin{array}{cc}
\frac {\partial x} {\partial r} & \frac {\partial t} {\partial r}\\
\frac {\partial x} {\partial s} & \frac {\partial t} {\partial s}
\end{array}
\right) = det
\left( \begin{array}{cc}
h'(r) & 0\\
0 & h'(s)
\end{array}
\right) = h'(r) h'(s)

[/tex]

so you have:

[tex] dxdt = J \ dr ds = h'(r) h'(s) dr ds [/tex]

and

[tex] ln|f(x(r))-f(t(s))+t(s)-x(r)| = ln|s-r| [/tex]

and

[tex] f'(t) \ = \ \frac {df} {dt} = \left( 1 - \frac {ds} {dt} \right) [/tex]

And so:

[tex]

\iint_\textrm{A} f'(t) \ ln|f(x)-f(t)+t-x|dxdt = \iint_\textrm{A'} \left( 1 - \frac {ds} {dt} \right) ln|s-r|h'(r) h'(s) dr ds= \iint_\textrm{A'} \left( h'(s)- \frac {ds} {dt} \frac {dh} {ds} \right) ln|s-r|h'(r) dr ds [/tex]

[tex]= \iint_\textrm{A'} \left( h'(s)- \frac {ds} {dt} \frac {dt} {ds} \right) ln|s-r|h'(r) dr ds= \iint_\textrm{A'} \left( h'(s)- 1 \right) ln|s-r|h'(r) dr ds

[/tex]

which is what you got so I think it's correct :)
hnh
#3
Mar13-09, 11:13 AM
P: 7
Thank you very much-that is a huge help!

BobbyBear
#4
Mar14-09, 01:56 PM
P: 162
Double integral/change of variable

You're welcome


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Change of variable in double integrals Calculus & Beyond Homework 0
Double integral - change of variables Calculus & Beyond Homework 2
Change fo variable 2 Introductory Physics Homework 0
Change fo variable 2 Introductory Physics Homework 0