Change of Variables in Double Volume Integral

In summary, Greiner's Classical Electromagnetism book (page 126) has a derivation that involves a change of variables to \mathbf{z} and states that it is possible to move the 1/|\mathbf{r} - \mathbf{z}| term out of the \mathbf{r}' integral. This may seem incorrect, but it is justified because the integration with respect to \mathbf{r}' is done with \mathbf{z} held constant, and the domain of integration changes accordingly. This concept is helpful in understanding the substitution of independent variables in a mathematical derivation.
  • #1
pherytic
7
0
In Greiner's Classical Electromagnetism book (page 126) he has a derivation equivalent to the following.
$$\int_V d^3r^{'} \nabla \int_V d^3r^{''}\frac {f(\bf r^{''})}{|\bf r + \bf r^{'}- \bf r^{''}|}$$

$$ \bf z = \bf r^{''} - \bf r^{'} $$

$$\int_V d^3r^{'} \nabla \int_V d^3z \frac {f(\bf z + \bf r^{'})}{|\bf r - \bf z|}$$$$\nabla\int_V d^3z \frac{1}{|\bf r - \bf z|} \int_V d^3r^{'} {f(\bf z + \bf r^{'})}$$

The book says that after the change of variables to z, it is okay to just move the 1/|r-z| term out of the r' integral. But this doesn't make sense to me, given z is still a function of r'. Am I missing something or is this mathematically incorrect?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The integration with respect to [itex]\mathbf{r}'[/itex] is with [itex]\mathbf{z}[/itex] held constant. You have replaced the independent variables [itex]\mathbf{r}'[/itex] and [itex]\mathbf{r}''[/itex] with the independent variables [itex]\mathbf{r}'[/itex] and [itex]\mathbf{z}[/itex] by replacing [itex]\mathbf{r}''[/itex] with [itex]\mathbf{r}' + \mathbf{z}[/itex]. It then makes sense to do the integral over [itex]\mathbf{r}'[/itex] first, precisely because you can regard [itex]\|\mathbf{r} - \mathbf{z}\|[/itex] as constant while doing so. The domain of integration will have changed because we require both [itex]\mathbf{r}' \in V[/itex] and [itex]\mathbf{r}' + \mathbf{z} \in V[/itex].
 
  • Like
Likes pherytic
  • #3
Thank you, that really helped. If the two original variables are independent wrt each other, that has to still be true after substitution.
 

1. What is the purpose of using change of variables in double volume integrals?

The purpose of using change of variables in double volume integrals is to simplify the integration process by transforming the original variables into new ones that are easier to work with. This can help solve complex integrals and make calculations more efficient.

2. How do you determine the appropriate change of variables for a double volume integral?

The appropriate change of variables for a double volume integral can be determined by considering the shape and boundaries of the region being integrated, as well as the symmetry of the integrand. It is important to choose a change of variables that will result in a simpler integral.

3. Can any type of function be used as a change of variables in a double volume integral?

No, the function used as a change of variables must be one-to-one and have a continuous derivative. This ensures that the transformed volume element is well-defined and the integral can be properly evaluated.

4. What is the Jacobian and how is it used in change of variables for double volume integrals?

The Jacobian is a matrix that represents the scale factor of the transformation between the original and new variables. It is used in change of variables for double volume integrals to account for the change in volume element and adjust the limits of integration accordingly.

5. Are there any limitations or restrictions when using change of variables in double volume integrals?

Yes, there are some limitations and restrictions when using change of variables in double volume integrals. These include ensuring that the transformation is one-to-one and has a continuous derivative, as well as considering the boundaries and symmetry of the region being integrated. It is also important to check for any singularities or points of discontinuity in the original function.

Similar threads

  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
295
  • Calculus
Replies
29
Views
725
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
652
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
563
Replies
4
Views
357
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Calculus
Replies
7
Views
1K
Back
Top