|Jul26-09, 06:26 PM||#1|
Clouds and Global Warming
When it comes to global warming from CO2, the toughest question is how are clouds going to respond? The IPCC has about 20 differant climate models, but only one includes a change in cloud cover. The reason is that there hasn't been much evidence (until now) about how clouds would actually respond to CO2 warming. However, what is being found is not encouraging...
|Jul27-09, 01:02 AM||#2|
Blog Entries: 9
But I have a couple of quibbles.
First, most climate models do include changes in cloud cover -- and I would have thought this would be in ALL the models compared by the IPCC. I have no idea what the Time article means by saying only one model does this.
Added in edit. Found out. The extract from Time is inacccurate, and mixes up what is reported in science magazine. In fact, all the models do include the effects of cloud cover. The Hadley model stands out for obtaining results that are closest to what has been measured in this research for the effect of low lying cloud.
It should be noted that models don't pre-suppose how cloud cover changes. The amount of cloud is a something that depends on local conditions; same as in a weather model. I can't tell from the article what if anything is different about the Hadley climate model.
One of the basic comparisons of climate models is to see the effect of cloud in the model. In studies of feedback within models (section 8.6 of the IPCC report covers this) cloud feedbacks from chances in cover and composition and so on are compared... along with other feedback diagnostic measurements... for a large range of models.
Second... and I am not sure how relevant this quibble really is... one of the biggest problems with cloud in models is (I think) not so much with the amount of cover, but with the impact of cloud on the way energy flows in the system. Clouds reflect, absorb and scatter light in ways that depend on altitude, thickness, droplet size, and so on. Sorting out their effect is hard.
It is certainly the case that cloud modelling is identified as one area on which climate models need to make progress, and the work you are reporting seems to be a useful input on studies of how cloud and climate interact.
Cheers -- sylas
|Jul27-09, 02:31 AM||#3|
The study in question only focuses on a relatively small region of the globe (the Northeast Pacific, roughly 115° to 145°W, 15° to 25°N) and is thus a relatively small sample of what may happen over the globe. It also focuses exclusively on the low clouds which influence the albedo, whereas high clouds may potentially play as big a part in feedback (or bigger) through their influence on the outgoing energy side of the equation (see Lindzen's IRIS or Hartmann's FAT hypothesis for instance). So, I've emphasized in some other comments at RealClimate and ClimateProgress for example that the paper should not be over-hyped.
The claim about "1 model producing cloud changes" is not correct, but the potential confusion is that the authors note in the Science paper that only one model produces the change in NE pacific cloud cover which is consistent with their observations. This may mean that a tendency exists to undersubscribe a positive cloud-albedo feedback in many other models, and evaluating future cloud feedback from one model is not ideal. But I think this is something that needs to be looked at over different regions and the quality of observations must improve as well. Cloud trends and how global cloud feedback will behave in the future is still very much uncertain.
|Jul27-09, 10:35 AM||#4|
Clouds and Global Warming
Thanks for the good comments.
Earth is called the Blue Planet, but there sure are a lot of clouds too.
|Jul27-09, 02:10 PM||#5|
Another interesting recent paper on cloud formation is:
Title:Potential Biases in Feedback Diagnosis from Observational Data: A Simple Model Demonstration
Authors:Spencer, Roy W.; Braswell, William D.
Publication:Journal of Climate, vol. 21, issue 21, p. 5624
You can download the full paper here: http://www.drroyspencer.com/Spencer-and-Braswell-08.pdf
The paper seems to suggest that there are basic causality issues with the interactions between temperature and clouds in climate models.
Based on the Acknowledgments, it appears the paper was significantly revised based on the input from reviewers, Piers Forster and Isaac Held. I checked their CV and found this paper from Dr. Held:
Soden, Held, Colman, Shell, Kiehl, and Shields, 2008: Quantifying climate feedbacks using radiative kernels. Journal of Climate
You can access some more of Dr. Held peer-reviewed papers here:
|atmosphere, clouds, co2, global warming, models|
|Similar Threads for: Clouds and Global Warming|
|Can Global Warming Cause ...||Earth||88|
|global warming||General Discussion||3|
|global warming||Introductory Physics Homework||4|