Thread Closed

Is a Pseudo-Wavefunction Really a Mixed State?

 
Share Thread Thread Tools
Aug28-09, 05:24 PM   #1
 

Is a Pseudo-Wavefunction Really a Mixed State?


Hello,

I'm studying pseudopotentials right now, and I had an epiphany that the pseudo-wavefunction is really mixed-state of the original Hamiltonian. Has anyone ever thought about a pseudo-wavefunction that way? Just curious.

modey3
 
PhysOrg.com
PhysOrg
physics news on PhysOrg.com

>> Promising doped zirconia
>> Nanocrystals grow from liquid interface
>> New insights into how materials transfer heat could lead to improved electronics
Aug29-09, 01:59 PM   #2
 
I'm don't think that's correct. Pseudopotentials remove nodes that are near the core, so a pseudopotential for Nb (say) will have 4d valence states, however the 4d states will not have a node near the core so they really will look like 3d states. I don't think you can accomplish elimination of a node by mixing states with n > 4.
 
Aug29-09, 03:22 PM   #3
 
kanato,

If you take the overlap integral between the pseduo-wavefunction and a particular all-electron valence and the core wavefunctions you get non-zero terms. This means that the pseudo wavefunction can be represented as a sum of core-states and the valence states each scaled by their overlaps with the pseduo-wavefunction. The OPW-method does this.
 
Aug29-09, 07:07 PM   #4
 

Is a Pseudo-Wavefunction Really a Mixed State?


Sure, there's non-zero overlap, but I am unconvinced as to whether the all-electron basis is "complete enough" to represent the pseudo-wavefunction.
 
Thread Closed
Thread Tools


Similar Threads for: Is a Pseudo-Wavefunction Really a Mixed State?
Thread Forum Replies
About mixed state and pure state Quantum Physics 6
What is a Mixed State? Quantum Physics 3
Difference between Mixed State and Superposition Quantum Physics 6
pure/mixed state Quantum Physics 3