Register to reply

Inquisitive minds

by 1+1=1
Tags: inquisitive, minds
Share this thread:
1+1=1
#1
Jun20-04, 01:27 PM
P: 95
if a number is a cube and a square the only forms will be 9k or 9k+1. any suggestions as to how to vaidate this?? would the 8 cases work? from 9k to 9k+8? what does everyone else think?

yet another...

10 divides z if and only if (10,z) does not = 1.
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on Phys.org
Hoverbike drone project for air transport takes off
Earlier Stone Age artifacts found in Northern Cape of South Africa
Study reveals new characteristics of complex oxide surfaces
Muzza
#2
Jun20-04, 01:54 PM
P: 696
10 divides z if and only if (10,z) does not = 1.
Obviously if 10 divides z, then (10, z) is not 1 (it must be at least 10). But the converse is not true, consider z = 2...
1+1=1
#3
Jun20-04, 01:57 PM
P: 95
that really doesn't help much, i kind of thought of that. this is one of those proofs that need to show one way then the other. that is all i am coming up with.

Muzza
#4
Jun20-04, 01:58 PM
P: 696
Inquisitive minds

this is one of those proofs that need to show one way then the other.
But, uh, didn't I just give a counterexample to the other implication? And thus, it's false?
1+1=1
#5
Jun20-04, 02:19 PM
P: 95
so if i have the left hand side saying that if you choose n = 1, then that says that (10,n) cannot = 1. with = to 2, it says the same thing, so it would work for all n except for 10, and that would givbe you 1. the right hand side would say that (10,n) not = 1. could i assume that it DOES = 1 and show a contradiction? would that be valid for this type of proof?
1+1=1
#6
Jun20-04, 02:22 PM
P: 95
does anyone have any suggestions on the first question? would showing the 8 cases be the easiest way to p[rove this? i am thinking so, just square them and cube at the same time, or should i square them first THEN cube?
Gokul43201
#7
Jun20-04, 03:34 PM
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
Gokul43201's Avatar
P: 11,155
For a number, k, to be a square and a cube, it needs to be the 6th power of another number. This is evident from the prime factorization of k. So, we need to show that

[tex] k = n^{6m} \equiv 0 or 1 (mod 9) [/tex]

So we need consider only the nine cases n=0,1,2,...,8

[tex]0^{6} = 0 \equiv 0 (mod 9)[/tex]

[tex]1^{6} = 1 \equiv 1 (mod 9)[/tex]

[tex]2^{6} = 64 \equiv 1 (mod 9)[/tex]

[tex]3^{6} \equiv 6^{6m} \equiv 0 (mod 9)[/tex]

[tex]4^{6} = 2^{12} \equiv 1 (mod 9)[/tex]

[tex]5^{6} \equiv (-4)^6 = 4^6 \equiv 1 (mod 9)[/tex]

[tex]7^{6} \equiv (-2)^6 = 2^6 \equiv 1 (mod 9)[/tex] and

[tex]8^{6} \equiv (-1)^6 = 1 (mod 9)[/tex]

And of course, 0^m = 0 and 1^m = 1, so that completes the proof.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Many Worlds and Many Minds Quantum Physics 2
Inquiring minds General Discussion 1
Hearts and Minds Current Events 67
Two minds? General Discussion 8