Register to reply 
Trapezoidal, simpsons rule, and higher order approximations 
Share this thread: 
#1
Dec409, 09:25 AM

P: 53

hi. i was able to prove the trapezoidal rule and simpsons rule. (basically i used matrices to determine the coefficients m and b for mx+b when proving the trapezoidal rule and a,b,c for ax^2+bx+c such that the points coincide, then i integrated the approximating polynomial) the amount of numbercrunching and expanding products of linear terms was probably the most work ive ever done, but i was amazed to see terms cancel out to yeild vastly simplified formulas. but i was wondering, suppose i approximated each step with suppose, a cubic equation. i know how to do this, but after setting up the 4x4 matrix i quickly realized that this would be extremely mundane due to all the algebraic manipulations. so before i try deriving a numerical method that uses cubics to approximate the curve pieces, i wanna know whether it will simplify. will it simplify?



#2
Dec409, 09:36 AM

Sci Advisor
HW Helper
PF Gold
P: 12,016

You can look upon NewtonCotes formulae, and Gaussian quadrature to see how these numerical techniques have been developed:
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/NewtonCotesFormulas.html 


Register to reply 
Related Discussions  
Quotient rule for higher order derivatives  Calculus  17  
Higher order partial derivatives and the chain rule  Calculus & Beyond Homework  5  
Bayes rule using higher order prior probability  Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics  1  
Trapezoidal Rule  Calculus  11 