First ODI Double Century!


by George Jones
Tags: century, double
George Jones
George Jones is offline
#1
Feb24-10, 08:53 AM
Mentor
George Jones's Avatar
P: 6,044
Against South Africa today, Tendulkar scored the first ODI double century.
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on Phys.org
Cougars' diverse diet helped them survive the Pleistocene mass extinction
Cyber risks can cause disruption on scale of 2008 crisis, study says
Mantis shrimp stronger than airplanes
matt.o
matt.o is offline
#2
Feb24-10, 02:41 PM
P: 391
Geez! I saw he was 124 n.o after 33 overs and though SA might be in a bit of trouble! Mind you, I'm not sure 200 on the small, lightning fast Indian outfields would be 200 anywhere else. In any case, it's a mean feat, so well done to the Little Master!
Jack21222
Jack21222 is offline
#3
Feb24-10, 07:34 PM
P: 771
In English, please? I'm too lazy to start googling terms, but I'm interested enough to want to know more aobut this accomplishment.

Amar.alchemy
Amar.alchemy is offline
#4
Feb25-10, 01:22 AM
P: 80

First ODI Double Century!


If Cricket is a religion then Sachin is God and i am his ardent devotee :)
hamster143
hamster143 is offline
#5
Feb25-10, 06:26 AM
P: 986
Quote Quote by Jack21222 View Post
In English, please? I'm too lazy to start googling terms, but I'm interested enough to want to know more aobut this accomplishment.
That basically means that someone named Tendulkar rode 200 miles non stop in a bicycle race. Not an easy task. Most humans only have enough energy stored in their muscles and liver to survive 50 to 75 miles. Beyond that, you have to rely on supplemental energy, maybe by eating an energy bar every 15 minutes.

http://www.ultracycling.com/training...centuries.html
Gokul43201
Gokul43201 is offline
#6
Feb25-10, 07:02 AM
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
Gokul43201's Avatar
P: 11,154
Quote Quote by matt.o View Post
Geez! I saw he was 124 n.o after 33 overs and though SA might be in a bit of trouble! Mind you, I'm not sure 200 on the small, lightning fast Indian outfields would be 200 anywhere else.
The previous high score for a team batting at Gwalior was 289 (by Pak, vs SL in 1997).

http://stats.cricinfo.com/indvpak/en...58;type=ground

And it's certainly not like he did it against an easy team either - SA is ranked #3 in the ODI rankings.

http://www.cricinfo.com/rankings/con...ge/211271.html
Gokul43201
Gokul43201 is offline
#7
Feb25-10, 07:03 AM
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
Gokul43201's Avatar
P: 11,154
Quote Quote by hamster143 View Post
That basically means that someone named Tendulkar rode 200 miles non stop in a bicycle race. Not an easy task. Most humans only have enough energy stored in their muscles and liver to survive 50 to 75 miles. Beyond that, you have to rely on supplemental energy, maybe by eating an energy bar every 15 minutes.

http://www.ultracycling.com/training...centuries.html


Wait, were you being serious? We do need that sarcasm/irony smiley.
Andre
Andre is offline
#8
Feb25-10, 07:07 AM
PF Gold
Andre's Avatar
P: 5,450
Quote Quote by hamster143 View Post
That basically means that someone named Tendulkar rode 200 miles non stop in a bicycle race. Not an easy task. Most humans only have enough energy stored in their muscles and liver to survive 50 to 75 miles. Beyond that, you have to rely on supplemental energy, maybe by eating an energy bar every 15 minutes.

http://www.ultracycling.com/training...centuries.html
No, you missed the Odie part. It goes like this.

Gokul43201
Gokul43201 is offline
#9
Feb25-10, 07:17 AM
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
Gokul43201's Avatar
P: 11,154
Quote Quote by Jack21222 View Post
In English, please? I'm too lazy to start googling terms, but I'm interested enough to want to know more aobut this accomplishment.
The game is cricket. Here's a quickie intro:



No one in the game of cricket (specifically in the One-Day format), had, until yesterday, accomplished the feat of scoring 200 runs in a single match. What makes this difficult is that, in addition to having to last long enough without getting "out", you have a limited number of balls to face. Sachin Tendulkar - who broke the record yesterday - is considered by many cricket experts to be the best batter (or batsman) the game has today, and easily among the best of all time.
rootX
rootX is offline
#10
Feb25-10, 08:12 AM
rootX's Avatar
P: 1,295
Quote Quote by Jack21222 View Post
In English, please? I'm too lazy to start googling terms, but I'm interested enough to want to know more aobut this accomplishment.
I thought that is already too English. Did you mean American?
matt.o
matt.o is offline
#11
Feb25-10, 04:03 PM
P: 391
Quote Quote by Gokul43201 View Post
The previous high score for a team batting at Gwalior was 289 (by Pak, vs SL in 1997).

http://stats.cricinfo.com/indvpak/en...58;type=ground
That's not a particularly good statistic to test my hypothesis, especially given the low number of games played at Gwalior. Perhaps a better way to look at this is by comparing the batting averages on a ground-by-ground basis for grounds where there have been > 10 ODIs:

http://stats.cricinfo.com/ci/engine/...te;view=ground

or given Tendulkar brought up his 200 in the last over, perhaps we should look at the above, but sorted by average run-rate:

http://stats.cricinfo.com/ci/engine/...te;view=ground

Given the above, I will stand by my statement! (which included "In any case, it's a mean feat, so well done to the Little Master!")

Quote Quote by Amar.alchemy
If Cricket is a religion then Sachin is God and i am his ardent devotee :)
Yes, but this would have to be a polytheist religion which included the great Sir Donald Bradman!
Gokul43201
Gokul43201 is offline
#12
Feb25-10, 06:56 PM
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
Gokul43201's Avatar
P: 11,154
Quote Quote by matt.o View Post
That's not a particularly good statistic to test my hypothesis, especially given the low number of games played at Gwalior. Perhaps a better way to look at this is by comparing the batting averages on a ground-by-ground basis for grounds where there have been > 10 ODIs:

http://stats.cricinfo.com/ci/engine/...te;view=ground

or given Tendulkar brought up his 200 in the last over, perhaps we should look at the above, but sorted by average run-rate:

http://stats.cricinfo.com/ci/engine/...te;view=ground

Given the above, I will stand by my statement! (which included "In any case, it's a mean feat, so well done to the Little Master!")
Agreed! Those are better ways to look at the stats.

Yes, but this would have to be a polytheist religion which included the great Sir Donald Bradman!
Few would disagree with that. And speaking of Bradman ... http://www.cricinfo.com/india/content/story/96323.html
jobyts
jobyts is offline
#13
Feb25-10, 09:14 PM
P: 216
Quote Quote by matt.o View Post
That's not a particularly good statistic to test my hypothesis, especially given the low number of games played at Gwalior. Perhaps a better way to look at this is by comparing the batting averages on a ground-by-ground basis for grounds where there have been > 10 ODIs:

http://stats.cricinfo.com/ci/engine/...te;view=ground
From the URL above, it looks like Indian grounds are in general favor of batsmen. Is it due to smaller ground, fast rolling ground or slow pitch?
Doug Huffman
Doug Huffman is offline
#14
Feb25-10, 09:24 PM
P: 75
In re cycling 'double century', 200 km or 120 miles is the shortest of the brevets to qualify for Paris-Brest-Paris or Boston-Montreal-Boston, 1200 km in 90 hours. Brevet, Audax or Randonee.
Gokul43201
Gokul43201 is offline
#15
Feb25-10, 10:19 PM
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
Gokul43201's Avatar
P: 11,154
Quote Quote by Doug Huffman View Post
In re cycling 'double century', 200 km or 120 miles is the shortest of the brevets to qualify for Paris-Brest-Paris or Boston-Montreal-Boston, 1200 km in 90 hours. Brevet, Audax or Randonee.
In English, please?
hamster143
hamster143 is offline
#16
Feb25-10, 10:51 PM
P: 986
Quote Quote by Doug Huffman View Post
In re cycling 'double century', 200 km or 120 miles is the shortest of the brevets to qualify for Paris-Brest-Paris or Boston-Montreal-Boston, 1200 km in 90 hours. Brevet, Audax or Randonee.
That is more properly called 'double metric century'.
matt.o
matt.o is offline
#17
Feb26-10, 02:33 AM
P: 391
Quote Quote by jobyts View Post
From the URL above, it looks like Indian grounds are in general favor of batsmen. Is it due to smaller ground, fast rolling ground or slow pitch?
Slow pitches aren't generally conducive to scoring quickly. The grounds in India are small and have fast outfields, which I think is the dominant factor in the faster scoring rates and larger batting averages/inning totals..
chaoseverlasting
chaoseverlasting is offline
#18
Feb26-10, 06:22 AM
P: 1,017
Man, its all anyone here can talk about these days. The worst part is that I dont really follow cricket and never really have.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Who are the Greatest Physicists in this century? General Discussion 51
Storm of the Century General Discussion 2
Celebrating a Century of Flight Aerospace Engineering 0
The question of the century General Physics 4
The SR Question of the Century General Physics 268