| Thread Closed |
integration of 1/2x & sinxcosx & x+1 |
Share Thread | Thread Tools |
| May5-10, 05:25 AM | #1 |
|
|
integration of 1/2x & sinxcosx & x+1
Hello I was wondering why in this differential equation they did not use double angle identity, I understand how to get the other result also
So 1)Dif eqn: Dy/dx +ycotx= cosx Integrating factor IF= e^ (integrand of cotx) = sinx Solution yIF= integrand of QIF where Q is cotx from original question) y sinx= integral of cosxsinx Now I recognised this as ½ sin2x and the integral would be ysinx= ½(-cos2x/2+ c) therefore y= 1/sinx (-cos2x/4+ c/2) however this could be done by substitution y sinx= integral of cosxsinx let u=sinx to give ysinx= integral of cosx./u du/cosx ysinx= sin^2x +c y=1/sinx (sin^2x +c) why are they not the same ?? or are they really the same I mean if we differentiate either sin^2x or -cos2x/2 we would get back to cosxsinx 2) (x-2)dy/dx –y = (x-2)^3 dy/dx – y/(x-2)= (x-2)^2 IF= 1/(x-2) yIF= intergral of QIF y/(x-2)= integral of (x-2)^2 .1/(x-2) y/(x-2)= integral of (x-2) If I were to integrate (x-2) why is it (x-2)^2/2 +c is it the same as x^2/2-2x+c (I am confused about this one as from expansion I can see its similar but if I put any value for c into either say 1 I get different answers) 3)Finally integral of 1/2x I can do this by dividing by a half i.e ½ integral of 1/x =1/2 lnx but is itthe same as 1/2ln2x as this wway I say what must I do to denominator (2x) to get to numerator and then simply multiply this coefficient to the natural log of the bottom i.e 1/4x+3 = ½ ln 4x+3 Can I only do that if I cannot factorise out a coeff? |
| PhysOrg.com |
science news on PhysOrg.com >> Hong Kong launches first electric taxis >> Morocco to harness the wind in energy hunt >> Galaxy's Ring of Fire |
| May5-10, 06:58 AM | #2 |
|
Mentor
|
Two typical reasons why using two integration techniques yield different answers are
You did both here. [itex]\int u du = 1/2u^2 + c[/itex]. You forgot the factor of 1/2. The trig substitution and u substitution techniques yield solutions of [tex]\aligned y\sin x &= -\,\frac 1 4 \cos 2x + c_1 && \text{trig substitution} \\ &= \phantom{-}\frac 1 2 \sin^2 x + c_2 && \text{ u-substitution} \endaligned[/tex] With the trig substitution [itex]\cos 2x = 1 - 2\sin^2x[/itex], the first becomes [tex]y\sin x = -\,\frac 1 4 (1-2\sin^2 x) + c_1 = \frac 1 2 \sin^2 x + c_1 - \frac 1 4[/itex] So the two techniques do agree to within an arbitrary constant. |
| May5-10, 06:14 PM | #3 |
|
|
so a diff technique will give a diff constant?
|
| May5-10, 07:48 PM | #4 |
|
Mentor
|
integration of 1/2x & sinxcosx & x+1
Not always, but in this case, yes.
|
| Thread Closed |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads for: integration of 1/2x & sinxcosx & x+1
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| Derivative of f(x) = sinxcosx | Calculus & Beyond Homework | 2 | ||
| Integration of dirac delta composed of function of integration variable | Calculus & Beyond Homework | 3 | ||
| Calc BC - Integration Problem involving Constants of Integration and Related Rates | Calculus & Beyond Homework | 5 | ||
| What does sinxcosx equal? | Precalculus Mathematics Homework | 2 | ||
| Question arrising from integration homework (advanced integration i guess?) | Calculus | 9 | ||