CDM/MOND duality through Holography.

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on a paper proposing a holographic duality between cold dark matter and modified Newtonian dynamics (MOND), introducing the concept of MONDian dark matter. This duality suggests that MONDian dark matter behaves like cold dark matter at larger scales but aligns with MOND at galactic scales. The authors argue that interactions between virtual particle-antiparticle pairs in the quantum vacuum create gravitational effects that account for dark matter phenomena. They provide calculations linking vacuum energy density to gravitational mass, supporting the idea that dark matter results from variations in vacuum distribution. The discussion emphasizes the need for further exploration of these concepts in the context of quantum information and gravity.
MTd2
Gold Member
Messages
2,019
Reaction score
25
I didn't notice this paper, until it was featured today on TR:

http://www.technologyreview.com/blog/arxiv/25214/?ref=rss

http://arxiv.org/abs/1005.3537

MONDian Dark Matter

Chiu Man Ho, Djordje Minic, Y. Jack Ng
(Submitted on 19 May 2010)
We provide a holographic dual description of Milgrom's scaling associated with galactic rotation curves. Our argument is based on the recent entropic reinterpretation of Newton's laws of motion. We propose a duality between cold dark matter and modified Newtonian dynamics (MOND). We introduce the concept of MONDian dark matter, and discuss some of its phenomenological implications. At cluster as well as cosmological scales, the MONDian dark matter would behave as cold dark matter, but at the galactic scale, the MONDian dark matter would act as MOND.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I assume, the interaction between the two information results with a virtual particle-antiparticle pair.
This suggests a real energy in quantum vacuum. The energy has its relativistic mass, proportional to the energy distribution. The vacuum energy is a sum of the energy of the appearing and disappearing virtual particles-antiparticles. Its density is inversely proportional to the squared distance from the source of the oscillating particles.

Such a distribution of the relativistic vacuum energy creates a gravitational mass under a sphere which is proportional to its radius R.

The anomalous acceleration
a=GM/r2=4.2Gr3Dc/Hr3 =4.2GDc/H= a=3.25x10-10 m/s^2
where : Universe's vacuum energy density D=8.9x10-27 kg/m3
and Hubble const. H=71 km/s/Mpc=2.3x10-18 /s

This additional mass explains Dark Matter effect around galaxy and galaxy clusters.
NON-LOCAL QUANTUM INFORMATION IN HOLOGRAPHIC UNIVERSE
http://www.cramerti.home.pl/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Czes that is some interesting stuff!
We need more philosophers!
 
Here is a calculation of the professional physicist Erik Verlinde. It shows that virtual particle-antiparticle pairs from the vacuum cause acceleration as an ordinary mass.

Entropic force = T dS/dx , where: dS= 2pi k (mc/h)dx
The Unruh vacuum temperature kT = ha/2pi c
The total Energy E= Mc2 = (½) N kT , where N=number of degrees of freedom (bits) = A c^3 /Gh , where area of the screen A = 4 pi r^2
We get the Newtons Law of gravity, the acceleration a=GM / r^2

The entropy is lower close to massive object where the quantum information is entangled in a denser structure.
Dark Matter is just a difference in the relative distribution of the vacuum. The vacuum is our space-time, the aether of the General Relativity of Einstein. Minkowski's space-time is not empty - it is vacuum with its virtual particle-antiparticle pairs.
 
"Supernovae evidence for foundational change to cosmological models" https://arxiv.org/pdf/2412.15143 The paper claims: We compare the standard homogeneous cosmological model, i.e., spatially flat ΛCDM, and the timescape cosmology which invokes backreaction of inhomogeneities. Timescape, while statistically homogeneous and isotropic, departs from average Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker evolution, and replaces dark energy by kinetic gravitational energy and its gradients, in explaining...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 72 ·
3
Replies
72
Views
10K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K