|Sep3-10, 07:16 PM||#1|
I discovered a mathamatical truth that seems to have no clear logical foundation. Could anyone here explain the math behind the following?
A.Given the following recursive series:
S(1) = 3
S(2) = 2
S(n) = 6*S(n-1) - S(n-2) - 4
Define a new series as follows
N(i) = (S(i) + S(i+1) + 1)/2
B.Now note that for all i
1) S(i)*S(i+1) = N(i)*(N(i) + 1)/2
2) (N(i) + N(i +1) + 1)/4 = S(i+1)
3) N(i)*N(i+1)/4 = S(i+1)*(S(i+1) + 1)/2
C. A even more amazing paradox is that you can rewrite line 2 of part A as S(2) = 12, and make no other changes except to redo the math. Still B1, B2, and B3 again hold true!
What factors lurk in the background of this paradox?
Could yet another number be substituted for the numbers 2 or 12 in line 2 of part A?
|Sep3-10, 07:43 PM||#2|
You know there's a straightforward procedure to solve recurrence relations of that type, right?
Second order linear homogeneous recurrences like that are of the form
S(n) = A rn + B snunless they degenerate; I forget how to treat them when they degenerate.
|Sep3-10, 08:08 PM||#3|
|Similar Threads for: Mathematical Paradox|
|The Twin Paradox Paradox.||Special & General Relativity||3|
|There is no twin paradox - mathematical proof||Math & Science Software||45|
|Resolving the Barber Paradox and the Russell's Paradox||General Discussion||18|
|What is the resolution of the The Bug-Rivet Paradox paradox in special relativity?||Special & General Relativity||4|