
#1
Sep310, 07:16 PM

P: 891

I discovered a mathamatical truth that seems to have no clear logical foundation. Could anyone here explain the math behind the following?
A.Given the following recursive series: S(1) = 3 S(2) = 2 S(n) = 6*S(n1)  S(n2)  4 Define a new series as follows N(i) = (S(i) + S(i+1) + 1)/2 B.Now note that for all i 1) S(i)*S(i+1) = N(i)*(N(i) + 1)/2 2) (N(i) + N(i +1) + 1)/4 = S(i+1) 3) N(i)*N(i+1)/4 = S(i+1)*(S(i+1) + 1)/2 C. A even more amazing paradox is that you can rewrite line 2 of part A as S(2) = 12, and make no other changes except to redo the math. Still B1, B2, and B3 again hold true! What factors lurk in the background of this paradox? Could yet another number be substituted for the numbers 2 or 12 in line 2 of part A? 



#2
Sep310, 07:43 PM

Emeritus
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
P: 16,101

You know there's a straightforward procedure to solve recurrence relations of that type, right?
Second order linear homogeneous recurrences like that are of the form S(n) = A r^{n} + B s^{n}unless they degenerate; I forget how to treat them when they degenerate. Paradox? 



#3
Sep310, 08:08 PM

P: 891




Register to reply 
Related Discussions  
The Twin Paradox Paradox.  Special & General Relativity  3  
There is no twin paradox  mathematical proof  Math & Science Software  45  
Resolving the Barber Paradox and the Russell's Paradox  General Discussion  18  
What is the resolution of the The BugRivet Paradox paradox in special relativity?  Special & General Relativity  4 