How much time should you spend reading and doing problems

  • Thread starter Thread starter cs23
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Reading Time
AI Thread Summary
To effectively transition from reading physics texts to solving problems, it's crucial to ensure a solid understanding of the material. One should move on when they can explain the main concepts without referencing notes or the textbook. Active reading is essential; instead of rote memorization, readers should engage with the material by questioning the "why" behind concepts. A recommended approach is to simulate tutoring, which reinforces comprehension and connections to prior knowledge.When making notes, focus on summarizing key points rather than rewriting the text verbatim. Deriving equations independently during problem-solving is beneficial, as it deepens understanding and retention. However, for commonly used equations, memorization is more efficient than derivation during exams. Solved examples serve as valuable learning tools, but it's important to maintain critical thinking while working through them and to practice with unsolved problems. Ultimately, familiarity with equations and concepts will enhance problem-solving skills and exam performance.
cs23
Messages
64
Reaction score
0
How do you know when to move on from reading the text and going to problems?

Also, when making notes from a physics text, what should you be making notes on. I find that when making my own notes, I'm just re writing the textbook and having pages of notes at the end which take a lot of time to write.

Let's say i read a chapter, what should be going on in my head regarding what i read?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
cs23 said:
How do you know when to move on from reading the text and going to problems?

Also, when making notes from a physics text, what should you be making notes on. I find that when making my own notes, I'm just re writing the textbook and having pages of notes at the end which take a lot of time to write.

Let's say i read a chapter, what should be going on in my head regarding what i read?

10 hours a day is a safe bet.

http://www.lhup.edu/~dsimanek/chapman.htm
 
I recommend, more than anything else, after reading a chapter or attending lectures try to work through the problems without notes in front of you. If you don't know a formula you need, try to work it out yourself. Don't look things up or consult notes unless you've been stuck for a long period of time.
 
ParticleGrl said:
I recommend, more than anything else, after reading a chapter or attending lectures try to work through the problems without notes in front of you. If you don't know a formula you need, try to work it out yourself. Don't look things up or consult notes unless you've been stuck for a long period of time.

THANK YOU particlegirl! So when I'm solving problems, instead of looking up equations from notes or a textbook, I should try and derive the equations myself each time without the help of anything. I can see how this will help me immensely. I usually rely on solved examples and follow their procedure, which is ineffective because I'm not thinking myself.
 
Last edited:
I would say move to problems when you feel like you could explain the main points of the section to someone without having to look at your notes or the textbook. When you do read, always read actively; try to understand "why?" rather than just memorizing. After I read a small portion of text, I like to pretend that I'm tutoring someone: putting it into words that they would understand. That forces you to really understand what's going on and how it connects to everything you've learned so far, rather than just being able to regurgitate what the text says. Then, when you do problems, don't just try to get the right answer. Always make sure to ask yourself lots of questions: "Why did that method I just used work in general?" "What is it about this problem that allowed me to use that method?" "What other methods could I use to solve this, and why was the one I chose the best?" "What would I do if they made the problem harder by _____" Also, make sure to keep deriving formulas until they're stuck in your head rather than just memorizing them. Even if formulas are given, work through the derivations yourself a couple times. It takes much longer to get through practice problems this way, but you'll get a lot more out of it, and things will stick with you much longer. Professors like to throw those tricky problems on a test that most people won't have seen, but if you can anticipate those when you're doing practice problems, you'll have no trouble on the test. Also, if you're unsure about a formula (I know test anxiety always makes me doubt myself) you can simply re-derive it and have faith that you're correct.
 
cs23 said:
So when I'm solving problems, instead of looking up equations from notes or a textbook, I should try and derive the equations myself each time without the help of anything. I can see how this will help me immensely. I usually rely on solved examples and follow their procedure, which is ineffective because I'm not thinking myself.

That sounds a very slow way of proceeding. You should learn how to derive simple equations, like v = u + at, in your early courses. But, if you need basic equations like these in an advanced problem, actually deriving them will (a) take time (b) look daft to the examiner. Some (like v = u + at!) should be so lodged in your memory that you can never forget them - so use them, don't derive them (unless you are asked to!)

Solved examples are *very* useful, just keep thinking when you are going through them! Then do similar unsolved examples the same way. Note that the solved examples will simply *use* basic facts ("the derivative if t^2 is 2t...") without deriving them. Follow their example... if you ever want to finish an exam question in time...

In many exams you are given a list of equations you can use - you don't have to derive them - you don't even have to memorise them! Check with your lecturer if you get such a list of equations...

If you become a working physicist then you'll find yourself looking up equations a lot! So get used to it...
 
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...
Hello, I’m an undergraduate student pursuing degrees in both computer science and physics. I was wondering if anyone here has graduated with these degrees and applied to a physics graduate program. I’m curious about how graduate programs evaluated your applications. In addition, if I’m interested in doing research in quantum fields related to materials or computational physics, what kinds of undergraduate research experiences would be most valuable?
Back
Top