Laplace Transforms


by popo902
Tags: laplace, transforms
popo902
popo902 is offline
#1
May15-11, 11:51 PM
P: 60
1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data

Im having trouble finding ways to manipulate equations to fit something from the table

The two i'm stuck on are these

1. [latex]\frac{1}{s^{2}- 2s + 3} (\frac{1+(s^{2}+1)e^{-3\Pi S}}{(s^{2}+1)})[/latex] = Y(s)

2.[latex]\frac{1}{s^{2}- 2s + 2} (\frac{s}{s^{2}+1} + s - 2)[/latex] = Y(s)



2. Relevant equations

These are the IVPs i got them from
1. y" - 2y' + 3y = sint + [tex]\delta[/tex](t - 3*pi)
y(0) = 0
y'(0) = 0

2. y'' - 2y' + 2y = cost
y(0) = 1
y'(o) = 0

3. The attempt at a solution

I tried all sorts of things like multiplying the equations out
i still can't seem to find a way to comfortably manipulate it to match anything on the laplace table
can some one help or give me a tip?
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on Phys.org
SensaBubble: It's a bubble, but not as we know it (w/ video)
The hemihelix: Scientists discover a new shape using rubber bands (w/ video)
Microbes provide insights into evolution of human language
hunt_mat
hunt_mat is offline
#2
May16-11, 03:27 AM
HW Helper
P: 1,585
The first thing I would recommend to do is write:

[tex]
s^{2}-2s+3=(s-1)^2+2,\quad s^{2}-2s+2=(s-1)^2+1
[/tex]

Then I think the transform looks like a convolution doesn't it?
vela
vela is offline
#3
May16-11, 05:04 AM
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks
PF Gold
P: 11,534
Use partial fractions to break them up.

hunt_mat
hunt_mat is offline
#4
May16-11, 05:15 AM
HW Helper
P: 1,585

Laplace Transforms


You can't use partial fractions here.
Ray Vickson
Ray Vickson is offline
#5
May16-11, 01:39 PM
HW Helper
Thanks
P: 4,676
Quote Quote by hunt_mat View Post
You can't use partial fractions here.
Yes, you can. Some of the denominators remain quadratic in s if you restrict yourself to reals, but can be fully expanded out to linear factors if you use complex roots.

RGV
popo902
popo902 is offline
#6
May16-11, 05:49 PM
P: 60
I see i see
but how did you get the equations to look like that?

and could you get the inverse laplace transforms with complex numbers??
vela
vela is offline
#7
May16-11, 06:34 PM
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks
PF Gold
P: 11,534
Quote Quote by popo902 View Post
I see i see
but how did you get the equations to look like that?
Do you mean what hunt_mat did? If so, he just completed the square.
and could you get the inverse laplace transforms with complex numbers??
Yes, you can, but it's usually best to avoid that if possible. Sign mistakes are bad enough, but when you start throwing factors of i around, you increase your chance of making a mistake immensely. You can definitely invert the transform without resorting to using complex algebra.
popo902
popo902 is offline
#8
May16-11, 08:09 PM
P: 60
yeh i saw that after about 30 minutes of just staring at the problem haha
however, when you do carry j's into your laplace and get the inverse, they will still be complex right?
so technically you could have a laplace shifted by a complex value using the e^at rule, where a = some j?

thank you all though, it really helped
vela
vela is offline
#9
May16-11, 08:17 PM
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks
PF Gold
P: 11,534
If you do everything correctly using complex algebra, it will simplify down to a purely real result. In other words, the math is consistent. If it doesn't come out real, you made a mistake somewhere.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Laplace Transforms Help!!!! Engineering, Comp Sci, & Technology Homework 1
laplace transforms Calculus & Beyond Homework 11
Laplace & Inverse Laplace Transforms Calculus & Beyond Homework 3
Laplace Transforms Calculus & Beyond Homework 3
laplace transforms Electrical Engineering 1