| New Reply |
Order of system |
Share Thread |
| Jun1-11, 05:37 AM | #1 |
|
|
Order of system
1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
In control engg. we define the order of the system as (or atleast as far as I have understood as) Nu/s^m*(s+a)(s+b).... I cannot understand the base for such classification? Why are we classifying systems based on the number of poles they have on origin? 2. Relevant equations 3. The attempt at a solution |
| Jun3-11, 11:14 AM | #2 |
|
|
No, the order of the system is the number of poles (at the origin and elsewhere).
|
| Jun3-11, 12:57 PM | #3 |
|
|
CEL is correct.
Something to add however is the way you have written the transfer function - it's done for a purpose. In controls seeing how many poles are at the origin, you're s^m part of the denomenator, has many ramifications that can be crucial when interpreting a system response or designing for one. So in seeing, and perhaps formatting a transfer function in this fashion, it is an aesthetic move but can make things easier. |
| Jun4-11, 09:44 AM | #4 |
|
|
Order of system
thanks guys I was confusing myself with the order and type of the system... good I could get that clear just in time :)
|
| New Reply |
Similar discussions for: Order of system
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| Reducing Second Order ODE system to First Order | Calculus & Beyond Homework | 0 | ||
| converting an nth order equation to a system of first order equations | Calculus & Beyond Homework | 10 | ||
| Reducing third order ODE to a system of first order equs + 4th order runge-kutta | Differential Equations | 1 | ||
| Splitting a second order PDE into a system of first order PDEs/ODEs | Differential Equations | 3 | ||
| Reducing third order ODE to a system of first order equs + 4th order runge-kutta | Calculus & Beyond Homework | 0 | ||